View Single Post
Old July 8, 2012, 09:07 PM   #3
Join Date: March 17, 2012
Posts: 32
One thing I disagreed with was the courts ability to change the wording that the lawmakers chose. If the law said a "tax" then I would be more in agreement with the opinion vs. the SCOTUS deciding to make it into a tax despite it not being billed as such. When the POTUS pushes that this is absolutely not a tax, the SCOTUS should not be running interference for ignorant lawmakers.

At what point could the SCOTUS be limited in doing this?
SilverBulletZ06 is offline  
Page generated in 0.10823 seconds with 7 queries