View Single Post
Old June 22, 2012, 09:55 PM   #133
Tom Servo
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 12,153
Here's the Legal Historians brief.
I found that not only disenheartening, but intellectually suspect.

They have to dig pretty deep to find historical precedents for the prohibition on carry, but when presented with counter-evidence like Nunn v. State, they sink to pointing out Judge Lumpkin's support of slavery by way of a tenuous rebuttal.

If this is the best professional veneer the opposition can muster, I'm feeling optimistic indeed.
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Page generated in 0.06710 seconds with 7 queries