View Single Post
Old February 23, 2012, 04:27 PM   #24
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2011
Posts: 388
Interesting article, the data does show some marginal improvement with the crimp. All these groups are well inside of the accuracy I'm able to achieve with my eyes and my rifles. However, the sample is only five groups of five shots and this data is over thirteen years old. I think that a larger sample would yield more accurate results. I also wonder if the improvements in materials and processes over the last decade plus would yield lower numbers for ES and SD.
thedaddycat is offline  
Page generated in 0.02971 seconds with 7 queries