View Single Post
Old September 22, 2011, 10:37 AM   #10
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,207
`Speaking totally off the top of my head here, so someone who actually knows something chime in here.
Quote:
.40 S&W is the least forgiving of any modern handgun cartridge in existence, for a number of reasons.
That statement struck me--not because it might not be true--but because it has become an accepted catechism: Beware reloading for the 40S&W as you would petting a Siamese cat. Bad things happen.

Then I thought about it a bit more. Why?

The 40S&W is not much more than a 9mm scaled near proportionally up to 10mm. Both use short/efficient cases, both operate at 35,000lb pressure standards, both do require the same attention to bullet seating depth/residual powder space, and both are shot out of the same family of similar autoloading pistol designs.

Yet the 9mm is "ho-hum" whereas the 40 is "Yikes !"

The only thing I can can think of is that reloading data is all over the place, and the GAP/new reloaders tend to think of the 40 as a whomper-stomper and try to push the limits.

But the 40S&W loaded w/ similar attitude toward sensibility ought to be no different than the 9mm.

Thoughts?

Last edited by mehavey; September 22, 2011 at 02:24 PM.
mehavey is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02377 seconds with 7 queries