WHO PROVIDED THIS WEAPON TO AN 8-YEAR OLD??? That's the question the boy's parents should be asking. The PROVIDER of this weapon should be named as the defendant in a ten million dollar lawsuit.
If the school's administration knew of, and permitted, these weapons to be distributed, then they should be named as co-conspirators. Maybe even prosecuted under the RICO laws.
After all, aren't there penalties for arming children? Doesn't the school's "zero tolerance" policy apply to lunchroom staff?
Seriously, when I read stuff like this, I'm convinced the lunatics are running the asylum. And it's looking like the only way to stop this stuff is to nail them in court, using their own arguments and stated polices against them. (Of course, from some of the decisions handed down, I sometimes think the judge's black robes should be exchanged for a strait jacket . . . )
|