View Single Post
Old July 11, 2011, 06:22 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: February 10, 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 717
He first shot the unarmed assailant, letting the armed one get away, then proceeded to stroll around the shop (thus making clear he himself didn't consider the downed assailant to be dangerous) before executing him.
I'm willing to bet he didn't choose to ignore the guy with gun and shoot the one without one. The first part of the shooting was completely legal and appropriate.

The second part was wrong and illegal. But, no, it was not 1st degree murder.
Catfishman is offline  
Page generated in 0.03165 seconds with 7 queries