|
Posts # 5 and 7 are on point.
If I thought that I had a 98% chance of convincing enough people that a reasonable person would have believed that the property could not have been be protected or recovered by any other means,....
..that would mean that I thought I had a 2% chance of losing everything--fortune, record, personal freedom.
Not a good risk.
That does not take into account the costs, possibly astronomical, of prevailing during the investigatory and if necessary, trial stages.
Not a good strategy.
|