View Single Post
Old October 11, 2010, 08:10 PM   #12
Junior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2010
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 9
Under the reasoning of Murdock v. Pennsylvania, it could be argued that the imposition of any fee to obtain a firearm permit could be considered a tax on a constitutional right (to keep a firearm in one's home, for example), and would, therefore, be an illegal license tax. "A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution. Thus, it may not exact a license tax for the privilege of carrying on interstate commerce." (McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Co., 309 U.S. 33, 56-58, 60 S.Ct. 388, 397, 398, 128 A.L.R. 876).

Could it be that 49 states been wrong all these years whereas only Vermont, which does not have any licensing provision, been correct?
jansson84 is offline  
Page generated in 0.03479 seconds with 7 queries