View Single Post
Old October 1, 2010, 10:28 PM   #21
Al Norris
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,546
Today was the day for the injunction hearing. While we don't yet know how this turned out, another development occurred.

The NRA filed an amicus brief (unusual in district court proceedings but not unheard of) for the plaintiffs. The brief is available on the docket as filing #60.1.

The NRA brief goes to the heart of the scrutiny matter. They argue that the court has only two options: A historical review, similar to that used by Heller or strict scrutiny.

The NRA makes the valid argument that under Heller and McDonald, those are the only options available when deciding a 2A case within the scope of the right.
Al Norris is offline  
Page generated in 0.04785 seconds with 7 queries