[kraigwy]

But, sitting that aside, it was a great read:

In my opinion, not just in regard to case law protecting the 2nd Amendment, but the history asspect.

(I like history).

Maybe in reading (or scimming over) other cases I missed it, but in this case I found the History this Case present quite interesting. Not just in the reasons for drafting, but in applying the 2nd Amendment to the states with the 14th Amendment.

Regardless of what one thinks of the 2nd Amendment, the history this case provides makes it a great read.

To bad we can't force lawmakers to read this case in its intirity.