View Single Post
Old February 27, 2009, 03:10 PM   #7
maestro pistolero
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,147
I think it was important to decouple the militia, which is no more . . .
There are some active, state sanctioned militias who make take issue with that statement. And isn't the ability to raise a militia inherent in 2A?

I think he is speaking against those who posted here in this thread
I'm having trouble reading it that way. He's saying IF M16s that are useful for military/militia use are prohibited, IT MAY BE OBJECTED that the first clause would be entirely separated from the first. Isn't he saying that would amount to passing a law which circumvents the amendment, otherwise what would the objection be?

Last edited by maestro pistolero; February 27, 2009 at 03:18 PM.
maestro pistolero is offline  
Page generated in 0.04723 seconds with 7 queries