View Single Post
Old May 21, 2008, 03:40 PM   #11
.300H&H
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2008
Posts: 215
The .300H&H is argueably better than the .300 Win. in some resepects ie. initially flatter and more efficient...but Win.made a brilliant business decision by creating the .300 Win. and maketing it well. The .300 H&H was as classic as the 30-06, and if the H&H had been just a little more prevalent, in the U.S. ,Win. would not have been able to hijack it.


The .260 and .280 Rems. seem to have had a few marketing problems and one wonders if they would have done better if they were called '7mm Express' or some other such '7mm' distinction.


Seems like the .375 Win. would have lasted longer and been much more successful. I wish it were still around. The 41mag. would have likely been more popular if it had been introduced with a .41 Special like the .357mag/.38.Ironically the .40 S&W became very popular and sorta shows that there was a demand for such .41Special ballistic performance.


I would like to see a .22 or .25 centerfire pistol cartridge ie. think .257mag.

.300H&H is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02190 seconds with 7 queries