View Single Post
Old March 7, 2005, 10:47 AM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,323
Is full auto overrated

I don't mean to irk anybody here. I just want to ask (especialy people who own them) if full auto is an overrated feature of a gun. The anti-gun people seem to think that it makes a gun a weapon of mass distruction. But it's still a regular gun that needs to be aimed. SMG's it's a usefull feature, but for regular rifles is it really that much of an advantage to have a full-auto weapon vs a semi-auto weapon? The only places I can see it being needed is in M240 and M2 type weapons and for close quarters situations. A bad guy with a full-auto M16 spraying away is no match for me (Or virtualy any of us on this board), a semi-auto gun, and aimed fire. Am I wrong in my logic.
Crosshair is offline  
Page generated in 0.03655 seconds with 7 queries