Gewehr98
August 6, 2001, 09:49 PM
Ok, I know that the old Colt blackpowder revolving rifle had a propensity to chain fire all it's chambers. That's a blackpowder thing. I also realize that a rifle based on a revolver action runs the risk of having a bullet lodged in the barrel due to too much gas escaping from the cylinder/forcing cone gap.
Assuming that I could keep pressures high, cylinder gap close, barrel not much over 16", what donor revolver frame would I use to build such a creation?
Donors. Here's what I've considered:
1. S&W L-frame. Why not a K-Frame? Because for a K-frame, I'd want to run .357 Magnum loads through the carbine, and K-Frames just don't withstand the abuse of full-patch .357 ammo as well as their bigger L and N frame cousins. Full-patch .357 because I wanna make damn sure I don't lodge a bullet in that barrel, see above. L or N-frame guns can run the bigger .44 Magnum.
2. Ruger Super BlackHawk or Super RedHawk. Again, no problem with magnum loads, it's beefy, it'd boil down to whether I want single action or double action.
3. Freedom Arms Casull? Expensive, but you know a .454 Casull is gonna make it down the barrel ok, and with 16 inches or more of powder burn time, gain a few extra fps velocity. Damned expensive to kitbash a Casull into a carbine, though.
Action:
Now, what about the single vs. double action revolving carbine? How well would it work? I have no problem shooting a well-tuned S&W revolver double action, I've done it in the Steel Challenge with my race revolver. So I take that same butter-smooth double action revolver, and build a heavier carbine out of it. Still shouldn't be too tough to shoot well, I'd wager it would be even easier, with the added mass and sight radius.
Aesthetics:
I've seen Navy Arms' recreation of the Remington solid frame cap and ball carbine, but it lacks something. I would want a barrel heavy enough to have a real wood forend attached to it, to complement the nice buttstock. The forend would attach much like it does on, say, a Remington Rolling Block. It could even come back as far as the cylinder crane, and a nicely inletted metal blast plate (Brass?)could be used to cap the wood forend nearest the cylinder, to protect the wood. As for the buttstock, I'd want more than just something that looked stuck on a revolver pistol grip. No thumbhole, mind you, but a nicely proportioned sporting rifle with a tang area that included a pistol grip integral with the rest of the stock, kind of like a Remington Model 81's pistol grip/tang area.
Engineering:
I can see all of this coming together, but the fly in the ointment to me so far is modifying the donor revolver's gripframe to better approximate a rifle's pistol grip. Arched flat S&W mainspring, coiled wire Ruger mainspring, that would be the tricky geometry.
So am I goofy, or what? :rolleyes:
Assuming that I could keep pressures high, cylinder gap close, barrel not much over 16", what donor revolver frame would I use to build such a creation?
Donors. Here's what I've considered:
1. S&W L-frame. Why not a K-Frame? Because for a K-frame, I'd want to run .357 Magnum loads through the carbine, and K-Frames just don't withstand the abuse of full-patch .357 ammo as well as their bigger L and N frame cousins. Full-patch .357 because I wanna make damn sure I don't lodge a bullet in that barrel, see above. L or N-frame guns can run the bigger .44 Magnum.
2. Ruger Super BlackHawk or Super RedHawk. Again, no problem with magnum loads, it's beefy, it'd boil down to whether I want single action or double action.
3. Freedom Arms Casull? Expensive, but you know a .454 Casull is gonna make it down the barrel ok, and with 16 inches or more of powder burn time, gain a few extra fps velocity. Damned expensive to kitbash a Casull into a carbine, though.
Action:
Now, what about the single vs. double action revolving carbine? How well would it work? I have no problem shooting a well-tuned S&W revolver double action, I've done it in the Steel Challenge with my race revolver. So I take that same butter-smooth double action revolver, and build a heavier carbine out of it. Still shouldn't be too tough to shoot well, I'd wager it would be even easier, with the added mass and sight radius.
Aesthetics:
I've seen Navy Arms' recreation of the Remington solid frame cap and ball carbine, but it lacks something. I would want a barrel heavy enough to have a real wood forend attached to it, to complement the nice buttstock. The forend would attach much like it does on, say, a Remington Rolling Block. It could even come back as far as the cylinder crane, and a nicely inletted metal blast plate (Brass?)could be used to cap the wood forend nearest the cylinder, to protect the wood. As for the buttstock, I'd want more than just something that looked stuck on a revolver pistol grip. No thumbhole, mind you, but a nicely proportioned sporting rifle with a tang area that included a pistol grip integral with the rest of the stock, kind of like a Remington Model 81's pistol grip/tang area.
Engineering:
I can see all of this coming together, but the fly in the ointment to me so far is modifying the donor revolver's gripframe to better approximate a rifle's pistol grip. Arched flat S&W mainspring, coiled wire Ruger mainspring, that would be the tricky geometry.
So am I goofy, or what? :rolleyes: