|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 27, 2012, 10:28 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: August 23, 2011
Posts: 46
|
Thought on 6.8 spc in Ar-15 platform
Is the 6.8 spc here to stay or will it fall to the way side with the 300 black out taking alot of interest lately. What's your thoughts? Would you buy a Ar or any rifle chambered in 6.8?
__________________
Buy'em for fun and love of guns not status symbols. |
October 28, 2012, 02:20 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
|
IMO the 300 blackout is a crap round . At 120 grains it has good velocity at 2,100fps but terrible BC . At 220 grains it has good BC but terrible velocity 1,050fps . A 1911 can have that kind of ballistics with a 200+ gr bullet . I don't know the exact numbers but I would think the lighter blackout will stop traveling SS at about 500 yards or so and the 220gr bullet never getting there . Making 500yds it's max effective distance .
Thats just my thoughts on the blackout . Im sure there are some good uses for it . Maybe if you want a hard hitting CQC weapon the 300 blackout would work well . I could see it working well in urben areas where most of your shots are 100yds or less . The longest shot may be 2 to 300 yards tops . The 6.8 has much better ballistics . It's bassically a 270 in a smaller case .It has a velocity of 2,400+fps and a range of 900yds or so . I do plan to build a 6.8 AR but Im am torn between building the 6.8 or 223 wylde 20" bull barrel for my next build . EDIT . My point is the 6.8 has much more potential and uses therefore I feel it will be around awhile .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . Last edited by Metal god; October 28, 2012 at 03:13 PM. |
October 28, 2012, 02:32 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 145
|
I thought I read recently that Hornady plans to ramp up production on ammo for it.
__________________
I was told once "if you don't have anything good to say don't say anything at all" |
October 28, 2012, 08:06 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Check out the 68 forum and you'll get the feeling that it has quite the support from the industry. DD, Wilson Combat, PSA, Stag Arms and more companies make barels or complete rifles. SSA, Hornady, SB, and Remington make ammo and you can reload. Also hearing the rumor that Federal will get in the mix with ammo and Wolf maybe next year.
|
October 28, 2012, 10:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: Frisco Texas
Posts: 844
|
I had the same question..... I bought a 6.8 ar
Couldnt be happier More vendors are coming on line. 6.8 Bullet performance is Better at all ranges than the 300 blk. As long as there are 270 rounds to reload, (up to 130 grain) there will be bullets for the 6.8. 6.8 has 80% of the 308 and is a great caliber for deer and hogs I think you will be very happy with the 6.8
__________________
An imperfect servant of my Lord and Saviour, Jesus Buying American made, wherever I still can |
October 28, 2012, 11:48 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: August 23, 2011
Posts: 46
|
I read in guns and ammo that more companies were doing the 6.5 Grendel but haven't seen anything along those lines of the 6.8.
__________________
Buy'em for fun and love of guns not status symbols. |
October 28, 2012, 12:16 PM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen. |
||
October 28, 2012, 12:37 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
If you plan on shooting distances greater than 150 yards, want a semi-auto to do it but don't want the projectile to be a 22 caliber bullet, 6.8 spc is a good choice. If any one of those three things don't apply than you would be better served by something else.
Quote:
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
|
October 28, 2012, 12:55 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
|
300BO is crap? No.
Live up to the hype? Also no. I had a 300 Whisper for a short time before I sold it and went 6.8. 300BO/300Whisper/300-221Fireball is good for a subsonic SBR with a suppressor, but it just doesn't have the velocity or BC to keep up with the either 6.8 or the 6.5.
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen. |
October 28, 2012, 01:00 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
The latest Shooting Times has a long article on the 6.5 Grendel which shows that the ballistics are superior to both the 5.56 and the 300 in the M4 platform, and slightly better than the 6.8. You might want to take a look before making a decision.
|
October 28, 2012, 01:02 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Tx Panhandle Territory
Posts: 4,159
|
I have no regrets buying mine. I do wonder what's happened to the 90gr varmint loads of late- it's getting more rare that you can find any loads below 110gr. However, sonce I got into it- loads of 110gr and up have quadr... gone way the heck up.
__________________
Rednecks... Keeping the woods critter-free since March 2, 1836. (TX Independence Day) I suspect a thing or two... because I've seen a thing or two. |
October 28, 2012, 01:16 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen. |
|
October 28, 2012, 05:15 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2010
Posts: 1,860
|
I also dont care for the 300 blackout round. Its almost as pathetic as a 7.62x39 and nowhere near as good a caliber as the 7.62x51/.308. If I was looking for a hunting caliber for my AR it would either be a 6.5 grendel or 6.8spc. I think the 6.8 is all around better than the 5.56.
|
October 28, 2012, 08:21 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,071
|
I like the 300 BLK for what it is a harder hitting mid range(300 yds or less) caliber for the AR-15 platform that only requires a barrel change to convert. I don't believe anyone is saying you could win 1000yd matches with it....
__________________
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” -Margaret Thatcher- |
October 28, 2012, 11:04 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote:
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
|
October 28, 2012, 11:38 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
6.8 is likely here to stay.
It is also likely to remain like the 10mm or 41 Magnum is to handgunners, kind of a niche loading, for people who like to hunt medium game in states where the minimum caliber is above 22. The 6.5 Grendel is an interesting cartridge choice, but terminal ballistics aren't enough of a difference to separate it from heavy 223 loads, or 6.8 loads, and cost isn't low enough to tempt too many. It isn't exactly a true long range round (you run in to the same "run out of steam" issues as you do with anything put through the AR magwell,, just a tad further, but then you get into making your light handy rifle a big heavy monstrosity...) Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
October 30, 2012, 10:26 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
The 300 BO is a terrific round for its intended purpose: to allow a 5.56 AR to be easily switched to a .30 caliber bullet that can also work well with subsonic loads for suppressor use. The supersonic loads will duplicate the 7.62x39, and the subsonic loads allow you to be much quieter while supressed and yet still cycle the action. And the 300 BO subsonic rounds shoot much flatter than any subsonic handgun round.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." Last edited by Theohazard; October 30, 2012 at 10:44 AM. |
|
October 30, 2012, 11:19 AM | #18 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
900 yards? A 110 gr .277 V-Max, assuming you could launch it @ 2400, would be subsonic past 600 ........ and would drop 46 FEET from a 100 yard zero by 900 yards ..... Wind drift would be measured in double digits as well .... energy would be down to .380 ACP levels ..... I you were trying to break windows in an apartment building, it'd do that pretty well ...... but so would .223..... I like the 6.8, as a way to add lethality to the M-4 platform ..... but it is what it is, and it is not a "pocket .270". I think it'd be a great short range round for whitetail, if 130 gr bullets could be seated out long enough to launch at 2500 or so ..... but the 6.5G can do all that.... The 300 BLK is designed for suppressed SBR use.... I'd be all over that if that's what I needed done ..... |
|
October 30, 2012, 01:33 PM | #19 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
However I was using the data on the 130gr sst with a BC of .460 . This bullet will shoot 900-ish yards . and yes both of these bullets have significant wind drift and bullet drop . Cus I don't have all the data on the 110gr v-max . I would guess the 130gr sst does a little better in both these areas .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
|||
October 30, 2012, 01:50 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen. |
|
October 30, 2012, 03:15 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2004
Location: Vinita, OK
Posts: 2,552
|
Quote:
I like my 6.8 a lot. I have a wide variety of AR's but the 6.8 would be my choice if hunting was my main interest. A Barnes 85 or 95 grain bullet driven to max velocity in an SPC II chamber does amazing things to pigs and deer. I shoot a lot of 5.56mm and I've also reloaded it with the heavier bullets and used it for hunting deer from a stand. But the 6.8 takes your 5.56mm sized AR and bumps it up one level when it comes to the capability of the round. No one will argue that it is a 7.62 NATO round but the rifle is a lot smaller/lighter than an AR-10 as well. Everybody should have an AR in 5.56mm. And then they should also have one in .22 LR. But for AR #3..... go 6.8! Gregg |
|
October 30, 2012, 10:05 PM | #22 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
I'd like to see some hard data on that..... everything I have seen is maxing out around 24-2500 .... And 130 gr loads are generally too long to fit in an AR magazine .... and take up too much case capacity, leaving too little room for propellant.... so velocity suffers. How fast are you thinking you are launching a 130 SST there, Mg? Even if you launched it at full house 270 WIN velocity (3100!), it'd still drop 17 feet from a 100 yard zero, and have nearly 6 feet of wind drift in a 10mph crosswind..... but you'll never get that much velocity out of the 6.8, in any barrel length ...... it's not effective at 900 ..... To stay supersonic at that distance, you need more efficient bullets than are generally available in the .277 bore ..... Berger makes a .277 VLD with a .531 G1 BC ..... but that weighs 150 gr .... good luck gettting even 30/30 belocity out of that in the 6.8 ...... |
|
October 30, 2012, 11:43 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
|
Check these out . Looks like getting the velocity up with the 6.8 is no problem . My guess is none of these loads are maxed out do to liability concerns .
http://www.targetsportsusa.com/p-334...mmunition.aspx And this one , holy cow http://www.targetsportsusa.com/p-117...box-of-20.aspx http://www.hornady.com/store/6.8mm-SPC-110-gr-V-MAX/ http://www.hornady.com/store/6.8mm-SPC-120-GR-SST/ I'm in no way saying that the 6.8 is a great 1,000 yard round . Just that it has more versatility and potential then the 300 blackout in the ways I would most likely use them . I was making the point to the OP . IMO the 6.8 is more virsatile then the 300 .So I believe it will be around and used more by the general public .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . Last edited by Metal god; October 31, 2012 at 09:02 AM. |
October 31, 2012, 06:45 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
|
Quote:
There also seems to be a myth that longer barrels are useless in the 6.8, here's what it's capable of with a 24" barrel.
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen. |
|
October 31, 2012, 06:54 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,010
|
I have begun to find once fired 6.8 brass, discarded at the range. I think that it is here to stay. Just bought an 18" Stag upper to add to my 16" carbine.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|