|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: .308 v. 30-06 | |||
.308 | 6 | 42.86% | |
30-06 | 10 | 71.43% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 3, 2007, 07:31 AM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Next door
Posts: 161
|
.308 v. 30-06
Which is better round for distance hitting and hunting?
I have a choice of buying .308 Remington or 30-06 Winchester. Both have advantages, however, I am being told that .308 is better then 30-06. How much truth is in that? |
June 3, 2007, 08:24 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
It depends on whether you handload or not, they are pretty much ballistically identical in commercial loads up to 180 grains, only abuot a 100 fps difference max.
However if you handload 190 grain pills hot in the 30-06 it becomes a different story, and the 30-06 begins to shine. For off the shelf commercial ammo the 308 has a much broader selection of "accuracy loads". I don't recommend hunting with SMK bullets, but you can buy 308 loads with the 175 gr SMK and that is generally considered the best for long range accuracy with the 308. But if you really want to reach out and touch something get a 300 Win Mag. Like anything else in the gun world, YMMV. Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
June 3, 2007, 08:26 AM | #3 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Next door
Posts: 161
|
I would not hesitate on 300 Win Mag, but their ammo is not avialable in these neck of woods.
|
June 3, 2007, 08:46 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,482
|
Man, everyone knows that the .308 RULES!!!
Additionally, please be advised that my sources indicate that the United States Government has performed extensive testing on the capabilities of each round for long range effectiveness against zombies. As we all know (I've been warning you people about this for months now), the impending zombie uprising will happen, and we need to be prepared for it. Studies show that the .308 performs better at long-range zombie-brain-splattering than than the .30-06. |
June 3, 2007, 09:18 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2006
Location: Hinterlands of Wisconsin
Posts: 488
|
Tradition and history...the .30-06! It is chambered in more rifles than any other cartridge.
|
June 3, 2007, 09:22 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Next door
Posts: 161
|
After some research...308 wins hands down.
Check out: http://www.snipercountry.com/Articles/AccuracyFacts.asp |
June 3, 2007, 09:26 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
|
.30-06......
Wider selection of factory ammo Approx 100fps faster with same weight bullet .308...... Shorter action Better selection in "premium" ammo It's hard to go wrong with either, but when I had the same choice I went with the '06. I also went with a Rem 700, but the Win 70 is a fine rifle too. |
June 3, 2007, 10:00 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Location: IN , USA
Posts: 967
|
Hard to find a .30-06 chambered in any "precision" long range bolt rifle. That is the type of rifle I prefer for extended shooting sessions. Just in the Remington line they have chambered in .308:
700P 700LTR 700 VLS 700 SPS Varmint 700 SPS Tactical 700 VS SFII All of these are the heavy barrel tactical/varmint style rifles and none are chambered in the .30-06. If the largest rifle maker in the US chooses not to chamber these types of rifles in .30-06 it must indicate the demand is not there. In other words I choose the .308!
__________________
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors." |
June 3, 2007, 10:13 AM | #9 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
This horse is still dead. This sort of "poll" nonsense has been done to death, over and over, since TFL first started.
There is a search feature, and I strongly suggest it be used, insofar as opinions are concerned. I note they haven't changed since the 1950s. Last I heard, that was way, way back. Heck, Buddy Holley was alive! And I was young and handsome! Art |
|
|