|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 17, 2007, 01:04 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2007
Posts: 9
|
220 swift takes down grizzly
|
May 17, 2007, 02:07 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: April 23, 2007
Posts: 39
|
Feel Sorry for that bear.
|
May 17, 2007, 02:11 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Not exactly what the doctor ordered for bear medicine, but three rounds at point blank range directly into the skull seems to work pretty well for almost anything. Sounds like full-contact hunting, though.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
May 17, 2007, 02:35 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 406
|
Quote:
__________________
Greg Miller "Remember, a valid point never overrules a family tradition." - Me |
|
May 17, 2007, 03:29 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2006
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,484
|
I am just curios why he was carrying a .220 swift in bear country...something like a .25-06 - .270 would be better.
__________________
"The only purpose for a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have laid down." "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them." -John Wayne |
May 17, 2007, 03:33 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,775
|
I guess if thats what youve got and it keeps you alive its good but i would feel much safer toting around a .45-70.
__________________
I love the smell of fresh shotgun in the morning. |
May 17, 2007, 03:39 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Location: PHOENIX, AZ
Posts: 992
|
God was watching over him that day .
|
May 17, 2007, 03:47 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 406
|
Quote:
__________________
Greg Miller "Remember, a valid point never overrules a family tradition." - Me |
|
May 17, 2007, 05:32 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Location: Owego, N.Y.
Posts: 218
|
Wow thats what I call a good guy to have around
|
May 17, 2007, 05:54 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
This is why I believe in carrying a sidearm as back up. I've been made fun of taking one varmint hunting before but I don't care. I live about as far from grizzlys as anyone can (though there are some blackies around, small ones) but I still don't care, though I carry the sidearm more for hogs than anything. Thanks for the link, thats a pretty good story. Very glad to hear the man is okay as well. |
|
May 17, 2007, 08:35 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
|
People make fun of me for carrying a pistol everytime I take to the field. No matter what I'm hunting. I tell them "It's better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it." This is usually followed by a few moments of the "hard thinking look" then followed by "Yeah, that makes sense.".
|
May 17, 2007, 08:40 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,231
|
I betcha he leaves the .220 at home next time.
__________________
Have a nice day at the range NRA Life Member |
May 17, 2007, 09:58 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2005
Location: about an hour north of the big apple
Posts: 549
|
"heard the first shot and felt the bear fall" Seems pretty darn effective to me!
Secondly, what is WRONG with you people??? Man, if someone uses a .338lapua instead of .50bmg for a coup de grace on a friggin squirrel your guys on on the shooter like flies on old fruit. Did it ever occur to any of you it was: 1) A survival situation... 2) 220 swift produces far more energy than ANY handgun aside from the 500S&W-TAKE THAT 45acp fans! 3) If it isn't a 30-06, magnum, or 45acp-it aint worth diddley squat for you people-get a grip! -VE
__________________
Ahh, a good old bolt action,a bolt is a remedy for time, afternoons with our fathers and their fathers, for the mighty olympic shooters, for the wanna be's,for the time of youth in the woods, for the young.......the old, it is timeless, classic, sleek-a piece of art forever to remain in our memories, our hearts, our future. |
May 17, 2007, 10:47 PM | #14 | |||
Junior member
Join Date: August 9, 2005
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 2,228
|
It's just as simple-minded to go the other way. There have been documented kills upon grizzlies with a .22 LR pistol, and all it cost was his hand.
It might be noted, as well, that several areas have minimum caliber requirements for bear hunting. They are usually the result of some unintelligent fool, who believed that heavy calibers weren't necessary, and ended up as bear-food. While the subject of caliber has been beaten to death endlessly, it does have a certain amount of truth in it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Compared to the power of a .220 Swift on a ground hog of say less than 10 pounds, we'd all be using 105 mm to hunt elk, based on a caliber/power to body weight scale. Yeah, you tell them how they're overpowered cartridges aren't needed. By your scale, you shouldn't need anything larger than a .22 Short to take the largest varmints in America.:barf: |
|||
May 17, 2007, 11:09 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Location: Owego, N.Y.
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
|
|
May 17, 2007, 11:27 PM | #16 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
|
Quote:
I am a firm believer in humane death. I fought on a former post that .204Ruger was not adequate for hogs. Sure it will kill them. But sure it could easily leave them injured and suffering. My thinking on that post was the .204Ruger was designed for thin skinned, light boned animals. The hog is neither. You can look up the thread if you like. Search for .204Ruger for hogs in the rifle forum. Quote:
Quote:
I'm with you on this. BRING PLENTY OF GUN! As I've said before, it's better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. There is a great advantage to having a super flat shooting .224" diameter bullet for hunting "varmints" though. You don't need a 300WinMag to kill a coyote. |
|||
May 18, 2007, 03:34 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2004
Location: norCal
Posts: 2,161
|
Wow! Thanks for the story. If it was me I would have a handgun on my hip, but I'm not sure if I could've used it since he had the rifle and got a shot off that hit but did not connect very well.
|
May 18, 2007, 03:42 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2006
Location: Home of the first First Lady
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Endowment Life Member Proud Son of a former Tomb Guard |
|
May 18, 2007, 07:57 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,655
|
The guy with the .220 Swift is from out here on the AK Pen where I'm at. His dad lives just up the street.
I suspect that's not the first bear he's whacked.
__________________
Stop Allowing Our Schools To Be Soft Targets! http://fastersaveslives.org/ East Moose. Wear Wolf. |
May 18, 2007, 08:20 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
varmint eviscerator (???),
I was not supposing that the .45 acp would have been the perfect round to take the bear out as opposed to the .220. When I suggested carrying a sidearm it was solely on the grounds that very many people lay there rifle down as in this situation and if they do happen to be confronted with their rifle 20' away (as in this situation) you've a much better chance at drawing a sidearm and putting 6 .357 rounds in the bears face than you would running for your rifle and getting off 1 shot. one more thing... Quote:
|
|
May 18, 2007, 08:53 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Posts: 127
|
50BMG on a squirrel, hmmm, I like the odds. I suppose that a 50BMG could be the perfect squirrel gun, you could just shoot the tree out from beneath it.
As far as all of us needing nothing short of an Abrams tank to take a grizzly, all I have to say is this, give me a night stick and a Budweiser, that bear is going DOWN!!!
__________________
"You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Admiral Yamamoto in advising against invading mainland United States due to wide spread availability of weapons for the general public |
May 18, 2007, 10:30 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 406
|
Quote:
__________________
Greg Miller "Remember, a valid point never overrules a family tradition." - Me |
|
May 18, 2007, 10:49 AM | #23 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Valium time, kiddies, and some warm milk. And then it's nap time.
After your nap, go back and read the article. Two experienced hunters. One set up for bear, the other for wolves. So far, so good. Find bear, kill bear, just as intended. Quote: "Tracks around the den also seemed to show one bear." The main "mistake": Set rifles down in order to deal with dead bear. Trouble is, it's difficult to deal with a dead carcass if you don't have your hands free. Second bear jumps out. .220 guy has to go get his rifle. Gets rifle. Shoots bear. Bear dies. The choice of rifles is not any sort of issue at all. I couldn't tell--definitively--from the article whether the second and third shots from the .220 were needed or not needed. If there was any tactical error, it lay in not having an open-carry, large-cartridge handgun. Still, note that even experienced hunters can get fooled. Neither expected a second bear to be in the cave, and from the tracks it was a reasonable belief. Art |
|
|