The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 10, 2006, 08:06 PM   #1
IM_Lugger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2004
Posts: 2,011
Mossberg vs Maverick

I'm deciding betwene the (18.5in or 20in) Mosberg 500 or Maverick 88

I know that Maverick is made by Mossberg, but what are the differences between the two? Any reason to pay more for the Moss. 500?
__________________
"I feel the Beretta is a great character, it's so strong and elegant. The other guns look dumb to me." - John Woo
IM_Lugger is offline  
Old December 10, 2006, 10:55 PM   #2
wolverine350
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2006
Location: ponca city ok
Posts: 746
i just bought a maverick 88, the only difference is maverick is made in texas and has a cross button type safety where the mossberg is on the top back of the receiver steve
wolverine350 is offline  
Old December 11, 2006, 08:25 AM   #3
timothy75
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2005
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,146
I think they're made in Mexico and assembled in Texas. Nothing wrong with that, but I've seen Mavericks in gun stores sell for more than 500's at Big 5's so I think it depends where you buy from. I would recomend you check the big chain stores since some guns are a much better price there like 10/22's 870's, 1894's etc. Good luck
timothy75 is offline  
Old December 11, 2006, 08:39 AM   #4
ATW525
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 2,723
Besides the already mentioned safety location the only other major difference is the design of the slide. The Maverick uses a one piece slide design so the forend is not replacable without buying the action slide of a Mossberg 500 to attach the new forend to. This could be a concern if you wanted to mount a Surefire forend.
ATW525 is offline  
Old December 11, 2006, 03:02 PM   #5
IM_Lugger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2004
Posts: 2,011
any difference in overall quality?
__________________
"I feel the Beretta is a great character, it's so strong and elegant. The other guns look dumb to me." - John Woo
IM_Lugger is offline  
Old December 11, 2006, 04:49 PM   #6
RevolverLover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2004
Posts: 1,682
Maverick also has only a year warranty were as Mossberg I believe has either a 10 year or lifetime warranty.
RevolverLover is offline  
Old December 11, 2006, 08:27 PM   #7
Diggers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2005
Posts: 366
With really really heavy use maybe the 500 would out last the Mav. but you probably don't have to worry about that too much, not many of us use our shotguns that much.

+1 for checking Big-5 and like stores, I see Mavs and Mossies in ads on sale for pretty cheap.

I just went and checked, here you go.

http://big5sportinggoods.shoplocal.c...pagenumber%3d3
Diggers is offline  
Old December 11, 2006, 09:20 PM   #8
rugerdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2004
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,443
I have both, they are the same gun and i would recommend a maverick to anyone because they are a great gun at a rediculously goor price.

Mine has a slightly different finish on the reciever, as well as the previously mentioned mechanical differences and I have no reason to suspect that the mossberg will outlast the maverick or vice versa.

Get the maverick, it's every bit as great a gun as the 500 and you'll save some money too.
__________________
"The SKS is a rifle, made the way they should be, out of a heavy block of crappy commie steel, set in an inletted semi-reshaped 2x4."

Not my quote but I agree completely.
rugerdude is offline  
Old December 12, 2006, 04:56 AM   #9
miscusi
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 217
I asked the same question, I decided on the maverick.
miscusi is offline  
Old December 13, 2006, 05:11 AM   #10
Diggers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2005
Posts: 366
Thinking about this a bit, and seeing how the price isn't that different, 50 bucks or so.

I would say get the Mossberg because of the warranty, as Revolverlover mentioned above. Not that you should expect the gun to break but its sure nice to have if it does.

I have a S&W revolver that ended up needing a new cylinder, the spent shells were getting lodged in the chambers. The warranty covered what would have been a very costly repair. I was sure glad it was covered.

MY 0.02 cents.
Diggers is offline  
Old December 20, 2006, 02:34 AM   #11
evan price
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: O-H-I-O, where men are men and Jeeps are muddy
Posts: 27
For what it's worth I prefer the Maverick 88 safety location over the M500. If you are not planning on doing anything to the gun just using it as is the Mav 88 is a better deal. If you want a cheap reliable well made shotgun to use and not be an heirloom a Mav88 is just the ticket. Of course if you want wood stocks and etc a M500 is what you want.
evan price is offline  
Old December 20, 2006, 09:13 AM   #12
Servo77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: Southeast OH
Posts: 905
I prefer the Mossberg because of the safety location. The tang mounted safety is visable when the gun is shouldered. Also, the safety on the maverick feels like it is not as substantial.
__________________
"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?!"
Servo77 is offline  
Old December 20, 2006, 12:07 PM   #13
antediluvianist
Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 2004
Posts: 63
To each his own. o too prefer the maverick's crossbolt safety. Have seen the tang safety get moved unintentionally.
antediluvianist is offline  
Old December 20, 2006, 06:13 PM   #14
Pops 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2006
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 141
I have a Maverick security model with 18 1/2 " barrel, I love it. Pops
Pops 1 is offline  
Old December 22, 2006, 03:29 PM   #15
rwking
Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: dfw area
Posts: 62
mav 88

i purchased the 88 last november, went deer hunting in december, this year i took it dove hunting, it never missed a lick, the only problem i have with the gun is the composite stock it makes the gun to light and it kicks like a mule(took care of that with limb saver). i have an old 16ga i retired when i purchsed it and it may come back out for bird hunting but the 88 is a good deer slayer.
rwking is offline  
Old December 22, 2006, 07:08 PM   #16
revjen45
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 626
The difference of $20-50 will be long forgotten while you're still enjoying the gun in the far distant future. This doesn't just apply to Mav vs. Mossy 500. I have not bought more than a few guns in the last 30 years, and whatever I spent on them is long forgotten. Guns, like pets, are part of the family, and I acquire them with the intent of keeping them. Of course, you can always make a screamin' deal that lights your heart every time you touch the gun, no matter how long you have it.
revjen45 is offline  
Old December 22, 2006, 07:21 PM   #17
cloudcroft
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 565
Some years ago, when I got my Mossberg 500 Cruiser, a friend tried it and liked it, but he didn't want to pay that much for one. So he got a Maverick instead.

We both went out shooting and for all practical purposes, I noticed no significant difference between the two either in form or function. No problems with either of them the whole afternoon.

It was as if we were both shooting the same gun.

Merry Christmas,

-- John D.
cloudcroft is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06503 seconds with 7 queries