PDA

View Full Version : 1858 Remington forged frames vs cast frames


Old Iron
August 9, 2013, 12:21 AM
What is the advantage of Pedersoli's 1858 Remington's "forged frame", when compared to the cast frames used by Pietta, Uberti, and ASM?

Is a "forged frame" harder, stronger, or something?
What type of frame did the original Remingtons have in the 1860's?

Hawg
August 9, 2013, 04:28 AM
Forged is stronger but for bp pressures it really doesn't come into play. All Ruger frames are cast. The originals were wrought iron.

mega twin
August 9, 2013, 08:50 AM
Is wrought iron "forged",or is there a different technique involved?

Old Iron
August 9, 2013, 09:10 AM
Thanks for the info Hawg,... that was a question I've had in the back of my mind for many years, and finally got around to askin' it.

I like investing in things that are "tough enough" to get handed down to my great-great grandkids some day. ;)

g.willikers
August 9, 2013, 09:55 AM
Pretty sure that wrought iron is a type of iron, rather than a process.
The term wrought comes from how it was worked, or wrought, mostly by hand down through the ages.

swathdiver
August 9, 2013, 02:33 PM
Uberti went to forged frames in 2007.

Roshi
August 9, 2013, 03:13 PM
"Forged" sounds better but in modern metal processes precision castings are as strong as forged parts.

radom
August 10, 2013, 01:07 AM
Just advertising so its how to charge more $$$ is all. a BP revolver in the Roots design cares not on that.