Doodlebugger45
August 10, 2009, 11:10 PM
I know we have all heard of light bullets being deflected by a bit of grass, but has anyone actually tried it?
This evening I went out shooting, still trying to decide which rifle/bullet combo I have the most confidence in this fall for elk hunting comparing my 270 WSM and the 7 mm Mag. As normal, I don't shoot at a real range, simply out on the prairie nearby. Also, as I normally do, I take my .223 Rem along, mainly to just give me more practice behind a scope and rifle and also let the 2 big guys cool a little more.
So tonight I find a great place and pace off 100 yards to put my cardboard boxes down to attach the targets. When I get to the spot I had chosen, I notice it had a few clumps of longish prairie grass a few feet in front of the target boxes. I found a couple spots that looked pretty clear and put the big rifles' targets there. I wasn't so concerned about the .223 accuracy though so just kind of plop it down in a decent spot I thought.
When I walked back up to my shooting position though and looked through the spotting scope, I thought I saw a few blades of grass about 2' in front of the .223 target. No big deal. I shoot all 3 and walk down and look at the targets. Turns out the .223 is the best of the bunch. Of course. So I change the paper and while I'm at it I change the location of the .223 target where I hope it's not obstructed by any grass. Then I walk back up to the shooting station.
Now though as I look down, I see ANOTHER small clump of grass a couple feet further away from the .223 target in my scope. Funny how I don't notice stuff like that when I am close! I can still kind of make out the target behind the dry grass, so I go ahead and shoot the 5 rounds and then the other rifles.
When I got down to the target though, I am surprised! The 7 mm mag and .270 WSM have very nice groups but the .223 is AWFUL!!. Instead of a 1" group, they are 6-8". All over the place. I'm pretty sure it wasn't me. The grass was very light and about 3' or so in front of the target.
Just curious. Has anyone done any rigorous testing on similar circumstances? It got me to wondering if I would have seen similar results if the light grass had been in front of the 7 mm mag. Yeah, that bullet is heavier than the .223, but it's about the same velocity. None of them were a .45-70 though. I think it would be hard to do a definitive test though. I can only imagine if the grass were 40 yards in front of an antelope though. Instead of deflecting the bullets 4", I would have been lucky to hit in the same time zone.
This evening I went out shooting, still trying to decide which rifle/bullet combo I have the most confidence in this fall for elk hunting comparing my 270 WSM and the 7 mm Mag. As normal, I don't shoot at a real range, simply out on the prairie nearby. Also, as I normally do, I take my .223 Rem along, mainly to just give me more practice behind a scope and rifle and also let the 2 big guys cool a little more.
So tonight I find a great place and pace off 100 yards to put my cardboard boxes down to attach the targets. When I get to the spot I had chosen, I notice it had a few clumps of longish prairie grass a few feet in front of the target boxes. I found a couple spots that looked pretty clear and put the big rifles' targets there. I wasn't so concerned about the .223 accuracy though so just kind of plop it down in a decent spot I thought.
When I walked back up to my shooting position though and looked through the spotting scope, I thought I saw a few blades of grass about 2' in front of the .223 target. No big deal. I shoot all 3 and walk down and look at the targets. Turns out the .223 is the best of the bunch. Of course. So I change the paper and while I'm at it I change the location of the .223 target where I hope it's not obstructed by any grass. Then I walk back up to the shooting station.
Now though as I look down, I see ANOTHER small clump of grass a couple feet further away from the .223 target in my scope. Funny how I don't notice stuff like that when I am close! I can still kind of make out the target behind the dry grass, so I go ahead and shoot the 5 rounds and then the other rifles.
When I got down to the target though, I am surprised! The 7 mm mag and .270 WSM have very nice groups but the .223 is AWFUL!!. Instead of a 1" group, they are 6-8". All over the place. I'm pretty sure it wasn't me. The grass was very light and about 3' or so in front of the target.
Just curious. Has anyone done any rigorous testing on similar circumstances? It got me to wondering if I would have seen similar results if the light grass had been in front of the 7 mm mag. Yeah, that bullet is heavier than the .223, but it's about the same velocity. None of them were a .45-70 though. I think it would be hard to do a definitive test though. I can only imagine if the grass were 40 yards in front of an antelope though. Instead of deflecting the bullets 4", I would have been lucky to hit in the same time zone.