PDA

View Full Version : 'Electric armour' vaporises anti-tank grenades and shells


papercut
August 19, 2002, 08:23 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2002%2F08%2F19%2Fnmod19.xml

'Electric armour' vaporises anti-tank grenades and shells
By Michael Smith, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 19/08/2002)

An electric "force field" for armoured vehicles that
vaporises anti-tank grenades and shells on impact has been developed by scientists at the Ministry of Defence.

The "electric armour" has been developed in an attempt to make tanks and other armoured vehicles lighter and less vulnerable to anti-tank grenade launchers such as those used by the Taliban and al- Qa'eda fighters in Afghanistan.

It could be fitted to the light tanks and armoured personnel carriers that will replace the heavy Challenger II tanks and Warrior APCs in one of the two British armoured divisions.

The ubiquitous RPG-7 anti-tank grenade launcher can be picked up for a mere $10 in most of the world's trouble spots but is capable of destroying a tank and killing its crew. When the grenade hits the tank, its "shaped-charge" warhead fires a jet of hot copper into the target at around 1,000mph. This is capable of penetrating more than a foot of conventional solid steel armour.

The new electric armour is made up of a highly- charged capacitor that is connected to two separate metal plates on the tank's exterior. The outer plate, which is bullet-proof and made from an unspecified alloy, is earthed while the insulated inner plate is live.

The electric armour runs off the tank's own power supply. When the tank commander feels he is in a dangerous area, he simply switches on the current to the inner plate.

When the warhead fires its jet of molten copper, it penetrates both the outer plate and the insulation of the inner plate. This makes a connection and thousands of amps of electricity vaporises most of the molten copper. The rest of the copper is dispersed harmlessly against the vehicle's hull.

But despite the high charge, the electrical load on the battery is no more than that caused by starting the engine on a cold morning.

In a recent demonstration of the electric armour for senior Army officers, an APC protected by the new British system survived repeated attacks by rocket- propelled grenades that would normally have destroyed it several times over.

Many of the grenades were fired from point-blank range but the only damage to the APC was cosmetic. The vehicle was driven away under its own power.

Prof John Brown, of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, which developed the Pulsed Power System at its R&D site at Fort Halstead, Kent, said it was attracting a lot of interest from both the MoD and the Pentagon.

With the easy availability of RPG-7 rocket launchers "it only takes one individual on, say, a rooftop in a village to cause major damage or destroy passing armoured vehicles", he said.

But the use of electric armour, which will protect against all shaped-charge warheads including artillery and tank shells, would reduce the threat to zero.

KSFreeman
August 19, 2002, 08:33 PM
Now I know what to use for my next trip to East Chicago!:D

mons-meg
August 19, 2002, 09:04 PM
But the use of electric armour, which will protect against all shaped-charge warheads including artillery and tank shells, would reduce the threat to zero.

Maybe I'm stating the obvious, but this part sounds a little media-hypey (Is that a word?)

Meaning, of course, that the only thing that will save your tank from a 155mm 95lb HE round going ~2000fps is Divine Intervention. Simple physics takes over.

Blackhawk
August 19, 2002, 09:39 PM
This assumes that the enemy is going to play by your rules. All they need to do is use an old fashioned non-shaped blast detonated on contact to strip or deform the outer plate, then the vehicle is defenseless against an RPG-7. Any insulator strong enough to withstand blast effects and have a high enough dielectric strength to make a decent capacitor would be something like ceramic or maybe filled glass.

I don't have much confidence in this solution's prospects, and I'm just plain incredulous at how "little" power it's supposed to take.... :rolleyes:

wQuay
August 19, 2002, 10:52 PM
Scroll down... there's some info on this. (http://zzz.com.ru/138.html)

Coronach
August 19, 2002, 10:57 PM
Well, it certainly sounds interesting, and (not being a physicist) I have no idea if it can do what they say or not. IF it is cheap, reliable and functional, it sounds like a nice addition to any LAV. It is not, however, proof against everything that can be thrown on a battlefield, and as such it sounds like an expensive form of mass suicide to use a vehicle so-equipped to replace a MBT. Why not just drink the Kool-Aide? Thats only a few cents a gallon...

Mike

mons-meg
August 19, 2002, 10:59 PM
If this is for APCs and other light armor type vehicles, maybe they should worry more about their ability to reliably defeat the nefarious .50BMG or 12.7mm?

:rolleyes:

Coronach
August 19, 2002, 11:12 PM
wQuay-

Thats a great site! :D

Mike

Tamara
August 20, 2002, 02:21 AM
Electrostatic armor has been an on-the-horizon thing for some time now.

Someday soon it will supplement, not supplant, standard laminate ("Chobham") armor on MBT's; it can't replace regular armor, as a long rod penetrator doesn't get much affected by a few sparks.

Jim March
August 20, 2002, 04:49 AM
"Polarize the hull!"

:D

Kentucky Rifle
August 20, 2002, 09:40 AM
Shields UP, Mr. Spock.:D

KR