The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 8, 2001, 02:46 PM   #1
renaissance7697
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2001
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 203
Using FMJ Formulae for Hard Cast Lead

I try to use Hard Cast Lead (for economy)
I go for "Light Target Loads"
Use is Recreational Target and Plinking.

Goal is:
1) reliable function in Autos
9mm Sig 228
45acp in Kimber full size 1911
38spl in S&W 52-2
and NOW >> .40 S&W in a Browning High Power
2) Reasonable Accuracy
3) Light Recoil
4) Low leading (easy cleaning)

I am partial to Hodgdon Powders >> Especially Clays Cays

I do not seem to be able to find much published data for "generic" Hard cast lead bullets.

I have heard that you can safely use FMJ and XTP data (for the same weight bullet) in good quality Hard Cast Lead.

Is this the group'sexperience ?

What can you recommend!
__________________
An Armed Society,
Is a Polite Society.
renaissance7697 is offline  
Old August 9, 2001, 06:18 PM   #2
Cheapo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 1998
Posts: 986
Checking load data from the SAME source, I usually see the lead loads at anywhere from 0% to 5% less than for same-weight jacketed bullets, with similar velocities and pressures (where pressures are listed).

Therefore, I see some small danger in using jacketed load data for lead slugs.
__________________
Let us never forget that the only legitimate source of government power is the citizens. If WE cannot exercise a certain power, we cannot grant it to the state.
Cheapo is offline  
Old August 9, 2001, 07:45 PM   #3
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,237
".....but not always....."
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old August 9, 2001, 11:12 PM   #4
Johnny Guest
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,116
1. Why do you call the powder "Clays Clays?"

2. Reason they suggest a bit less for cast lead bullets of same weight as jacketed, is that there's a mite less resistance with lead--Or, to say it another way, the pressures are a bit higher for the jacketed bullets.

It is common to presume that it is safe to use same data as for jacketed bullets for (lower pressure) cast bullet loads. The only way to determine the EXACT same velocity with the two is to do some chronograph testing.

Sorry, I have no data for Clays in the cartridges you mention. I have gotten very good results in 9 x 19 and .40 S&W with Universal.

Best,
Johnny
__________________
MOLON LABE!
Amendment II ensures the rest of the Bill of Rights.

Blog: Expert Witness
Johnny Guest is offline  
Old August 10, 2001, 09:52 AM   #5
Poodleshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2000
Location: Floating down the James River in VA
Posts: 2,539
Quote:
1. Why do you call the powder "Clays Clays?"
I've seen lots of newer reloaders using that term because they are confused by the existence of "International Clays", "Universal Clays" and "Clays" powders.

BTW, I'm using 230gr LRN with 4grs of Clays. It's still messy. There's just very little getting around mess when shooting lubed lead. Clays is a great shotshell powder though,so I'll stick with it.
Poodleshooter is offline  
Old August 10, 2001, 10:34 AM   #6
MADISON
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2000
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Posts: 2,678
Hard Cast and FMJ

Hard Cast and FMJ?
NEVER use the jacketed reloading data [FMJ] to reload any cast bullets. The lead bullets holds closer to the lands and groves in the barrel and causes + or - 15% more pressure than jacketed loads. You can used the Cast/lead loads to load jacketed bullets but, remember the loss in pressure and velocity.
MADISON is offline  
Old August 10, 2001, 10:48 AM   #7
renaissance7697
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2001
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 203
For Johny Guest

Ref:
1. Why do you call the powder "Clays Clays?"

*****************
To distinguish it positively from "Universal"

Last time I looked at the lable on a canister of what is commonly (in load data) called > "Universal"
It said: " Hodgdon UNIVERSAL CLAYS "

This can be confusing {it was (at least) to ME} at first.

Apparently I am not the only one.
I have seen threads complaining about the somewhat ambiguous was Hodgdon labels these powders.

I always make a point of saying "Hodgdon Universal Clays" and "Hodgdon Clays Clays", so as to be surely understood.

"Belt AND Suspenders"
__________________
An Armed Society,
Is a Polite Society.
renaissance7697 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07410 seconds with 7 queries