The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

View Poll Results: Best Belt Fed Machine Gun (I'm referring only to manportable ones)
Saco Defense M60 7.62x51mm 2 5.56%
Heckler & Koch HK21E 7.62x51mm 4 11.11%
Heckler & Koch HK23E 5.56x45mm 0 0%
Israel Military Industries Negev 5.56x45mm 0 0%
Fabrique Nationale Minimi (M249 SAW) 5.56x45mm 2 5.56%
Fabrique Nationale MAG-58 (M240) 7.62x51mm 18 50.00%
ComBloc PKM 7.62x54mmR 0 0%
Browning M1919A4/A6 .30-'06 (The A6 model was sort of manportable ) 5 13.89%
Stoner Weapons System (Belt Fed Config.) 5.56x45mm 0 0%
Something Else? 5 13.89%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 13, 2001, 09:31 PM   #1
Nightcrawler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2000
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,945
Best All Around Belt Fed Machine Gun

What do you think the best belt fed machine gun is in terms of reliability, accuracy, etc.? If anyone says the M60, please tell me what unit you were in where you got M60s that worked. Ours were Jam-O-Matics....
__________________
Nightcrawler- TFL Alumnus
Nightcrawler is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 12:28 AM   #2
PreserveFreedom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Isn't the M60 worth it just for the intimidation factor?
 
Old June 14, 2001, 12:37 AM   #3
JGardnerA
Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 26
I'm not basing this on any real life experience whatsoever... just the NATO Weapons Mod for Rainbow Six,
JGardnerA is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 10:17 AM   #4
Apeach
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: The 'burbs of chicago
Posts: 167
I do believe that the M60E3 model fixed most of the problems with the M60 system. But originally, the M60, like the M16A1, wasn't that great. It just required some experience through the Vietnam War to iron out most of the mistakes made in the system. Also, I'm not a big fan of 5.56mm belt fed machineguns. I think that the heavier caliber is more appropriate.
Apeach is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 11:14 AM   #5
Bruegger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 1999
Location: Indiana
Posts: 637
One more for the M240G

John Browning would be proud to use one.

I disagree with Apeach on belt-fed 5.56x45s. At the fireteam and squad level a 5.56 SAW gives much more portable, sustainable firepower than either a full auto magazine-fed rifle or a general purpose MG.

With a 5.56 SAW, you can carry 2x the ammo as with a 7.62 medium MG.

With AP ammo, the 5.56 matches the penetration ability of the 7.62. For fire and maneuver, a SAW can keep up with riflemen where a medium MG team cannot.

I'm not saying it's desirable to replace GPMGs with SAWs; both have their appropriate role: a GPMG like the M240G or the M60 is best in the role of making a base of fire for the maneuvering elements; a SAW is the firepower within the maneuver element.

Semper fi,
Bruegger out.
Bruegger is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 12:05 PM   #6
Nightcrawler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2000
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,945
Now, I've never seen a real M60E3, much less am familiar with its operating system, BUT...

Doesn't the M60 have a method of firing that wears down the auto sear and that's why they run away all the time? I mean, I went through a SAW class, they didn't mention combating runaways, so I'm guessing that the SAW is much less prone to such a thing than the M60. From what I've heard the MAG 58 is an all around superior design.

HAs anybody here fired/used one? What's it like, especially compared to the M60?
__________________
Nightcrawler- TFL Alumnus
Nightcrawler is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 02:19 PM   #7
BigG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,305
According to Small Arms of the World, the MAG 58 is a BAR mechanism turned upside down and belt fed, it is considered to be bulletproof and a pretty dang good current design considering JMB came up with it in 1917. The works look exactly like the guts of a BAR. FN sells them all over the world including, IIRC, are you ready for this?? Germany!
__________________
o "The Earth is degenerating today. Bribery and corruption abound. Children no longer obey their parents, every man wants to write a book, and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching." Assyrian tablet, c. 2800 BC

o "In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain

o "They have gun control in Cuba. They have universal health care in Cuba. So why do they want to come here?" Paul Harvey

o TODAY WE CARVE OUT OUR OWN OMENS! Leonidas, Thermopylae, 480 BC
BigG is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 02:45 PM   #8
444
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,727
To me, it is obvious that the best belt fed machine gun of all time is the M2 Browning. Lots of other machine guns have come and gone, but the M2 just keeps proving itself in conflict after conflict.
__________________
You know the rest. In the books you have read
How the British Regulars fired and fled,
How the farmers gave them ball for ball,
From behind each fence and farmyard wall,
Chasing the redcoats down the lane,
Then crossing the fields to emerge again
Under the trees at the turn of the road,
And only pausing to fire and load.
444 is offline  
Old June 14, 2001, 06:16 PM   #9
Bruegger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 1999
Location: Indiana
Posts: 637
Nightcrawler - I'm familiar with the M60E3. The Marine Corps used 'em until 93 or 94. It was a substantial improvement over the earlier models, but doesn't hold a candle to the M240G in my book. Like BigG says, teh 240 is bulletproof. A worn sear is one of the things that will cause a runaway gun. I can't tell you if the sears are more likely to wear on a 60 than on a M240G tho...

You can wear out the sear on any MG by squeezing/unsqueezing the trigger too slowly and firing bursts that are too short. Proper trigger operation on an MG is NOT like on a target rifle -- it is to move the trigger to the rear and fire a manly burst of 5-7 rounds, then release the trigger.

Semper fi,
Bruegger out.
Bruegger is offline  
Old June 16, 2001, 03:55 PM   #10
Turk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 517
Apeach

Your post:

I do believe that the M60E3 model fixed most of the problems with the M60 system. But originally, the M60, like the M16A1, wasn't that great. It just required some experience through the Vietnam War to iron out most of the mistakes made in the system. .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What were the problems? I carried a 60 for 4 months in 1968 and the only time it missed a beat was in a fire fight that the gas cyclinder plug loosened up and that was my fault.

Turk
Turk is offline  
Old June 16, 2001, 09:40 PM   #11
Apeach
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: The 'burbs of chicago
Posts: 167
I've heard conflicting stories of reliability about the M60. Some people, like you, have a perfect (or nearly so) track record with it, and others had a bad time with the weapon. I would figure that it was the weapon, or maybe you took better care of it. But what I should have said is that I believe that the M60E3 is more uniformly reliable in general than the M60 was, as in fewer people had reliability problems. Sorry for any misunderstanding.
Apeach is offline  
Old June 20, 2001, 02:43 AM   #12
blades67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 1999
Location: Chandler, Arizona, USA
Posts: 6,014
I have used and carried a number of different M60 machine guns. I fired three M60's during Basic and AIT at Fort Benning, all were 100% reliable for me. I carried two and fired four (at different times of course) M60's while assigned to 1st BN / 7th INF in Germany. They were all 100% reliable, even with blanks and a properly adjusted blank adapter. I also fired M60's while assigned to National Guard units in Arizona, Oregon and Ohio that were 100% reliable. Operator error is the number one cause of most problems with most weapon systems.
__________________
Guns cause crime like spoons cause Rosie O'Donnell to be fat!

I hunt, therefore I am.
blades67 is offline  
Old June 21, 2001, 05:23 PM   #13
Teufelhunden
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 115
Bruegger, have you had any trouble with your SAW's breaking? I'm not talking about stoppages, I'm talking about the 'crap-I-don't-know-what the hell-just-happened-take-it-to-the-armorer-immediately' kind of breakage. Ours go to hell all the time when we go live. Blank ammo they're fine with, but people are always turning the SAWS back into me with blank looks on their faces when we go for live shoots. BTW, I'm not an armorer, but rather a radio operator. We just happen to keep our radios in the cage, so the armorer uses us as armorer-lackeys

Blades67, when you say 'properly adjusted BFA' all I could think of was the cigarette butt down the barrel trick. I've always had trouble getting the 240G to fire with blanks, even after changing the gas regulator to all three sizes. I'll stick a cig-butt down the tip of the barrel, then screw on the BFA. An old gunny taught me that one...

-Teuf
__________________
"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm." -George Orwell

"One hundred rounds do not constitute firepower. One hit contitutes firepower." -Gen. Merritt Edson, USMC
Teufelhunden is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09466 seconds with 8 queries