The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 21, 2001, 01:29 PM   #1
Romulus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2001
Location: Kettle Moraine country
Posts: 865
Allright:

I'm now convinced that high-tech finishes are not worth the money, I'm going to reparkerize those firearms that need refinishing. I've field-stripped an 870 Express, and notice the ejector spring. This cannot be removed.

How will prkerizing affect the "springy" qualities of the spring? Will the etching destroy spring steel?

Mucho obligado...
Romulus is offline  
Old April 22, 2001, 02:57 AM   #2
saands
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,563
I don't have an 870, so I am not certain which spring you are talking about, but it would have to be a VERY fine spring (like a spring you might find in a witch!) for a surface treatment to affect it significantly.

Saands
saands is offline  
Old April 22, 2001, 03:10 AM   #3
Romulus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2001
Location: Kettle Moraine country
Posts: 865
Thanks, Saands

That's the point: The ejector spring is a delicate little leaf spring staked down to the interior of the receiver

It cannot be removed and reinstalled prior to prkerizing except with a lot of trouble - damn two-step rivets holding it down...so this paper thin spring might get etched to death, huh?
Romulus is offline  
Old April 22, 2001, 01:46 PM   #4
saands
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,563
Can you quantify paper thin? If it is really 0.003" thick, like a sheet of paper, then I would hesitate to etch it. My guess is that it is more like 0.025" or 0.035" thick, in which case you probably don't need to worry. (liability disclaimer goes here!) I am a mechanical engineer, but I have a LOT more experience with working aluminum than steel. Typical (non-paint) surface treatments are pretty thin ... I would consider 0.001" to be THICK! I did a quick search on the 'net and couldn't find a specification for the Parkerizing process anywhere. Sorry.

Is this spring stainless steel by chance? Take a magnet and if the spring is non-magnetic then you don't even need to worry! If it is magnestic, but shows NO signs of oxidation then either it is a magnetic stainless (many heat treated stainlesses are magnetic) or you take REALLY good care of your 870 ... in which case I would have to question the need to refinish it!

If it really is paper thin and looks to be a non-stainless steel, then you will have to decide what the risks are if its characteristics get modified. In this ugly scenario, all may not be lost. There are probably masks that you could apply to the surface of the spring that would protect it from the solution. They would have to be able to survive the 200 degree phosphoric acid, though.

Enough blabbering ... good luck,
Saands
saands is offline  
Old April 22, 2001, 02:07 PM   #5
Romulus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2001
Location: Kettle Moraine country
Posts: 865
mucho obligado

Actually, it turns out that I may have to remove the ejector assembly altogether, to clean and park those parts. Which means that the ejector spring can safely be kept out of solution, and restaked onto the receiver when the refinishing is complete.

Besides that, Saands, is there a hydrogen embrittlement relief step after the phosphoric acid bath, that you know of?

Thanks again for your interest...
Romulus is offline  
Old April 22, 2001, 10:57 PM   #6
saands
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,563
Romulus
I do not know of any process step in the typical parkerizing process that would rid the substrate of hydrogen. If it concerned you, a simple bake should help drive any hydrogen out of the steel. My guess (just a guess mind you) is that the parkerizing solutions don't have any constituents that would poison the ability of the hydrogen to recombine into H2 and just bubble off. I'm no chemist, though, and I refuse to pretend to be one! I am in the process of putting my first parkerizing rig together. I think that it will be the way to go and I intend on getting a chemical kit from:

http://www.mg34.com/Parkerizing.html

which looks like it will arrive well documented.

Good luck,
Saands
saands is offline  
Old April 23, 2001, 12:54 AM   #7
Romulus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2001
Location: Kettle Moraine country
Posts: 865
Saands, thanks for the link. I had been thinking of going with Brownells' zinc phosphate parkerizing solution, figuring that this would approach the gray-green that I love. And thanks for the tip on embrittlement relief: what temperature bake?

Thanks again
Romulus is offline  
Old April 23, 2001, 08:08 PM   #8
Wallew
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 3, 1999
Posts: 910
Romulus,
FYI, if you like the 'Park' look, consider this. As a gunsmith, when I have a customer who likes the flat look of Park, but doesn't want to parkerize a particular firearm, here's what I do.

I use a 'soft' bead in the sand blaster. This gives a softened look. I then caustic blue the firearm in question. The look is almost exactly like a parkerized firearm. I have set two pieces side by side and 99 out of 100 people can't tell the difference.

And the 870 CAN be refinished with the ejector still in place. That's how the 870 was finished in the first place. Hope that helps.
Wallew is offline  
Old April 23, 2001, 11:01 PM   #9
saands
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,563
Romulus ... If I wasn't so damned curious myself, I would have told you to look for the info yourself ... but I am THAT curious and this is what I found: Typically if a sample has the need for a hydrogen embrittlement relief bake (I'm still not sure that Parkerizing qualifies here ... but that seems to be beside the point!) then it seems to be the consensus that the bake needs to happen within 24 hours of the hydrogen being deposited. "The present aircraft standards and AMS 2406, average 3 hours post plating bake at 190 centigrade" (375 F) ... they say post plating because plating (especially chrome plating) is where the highest exposure is found.

Hope this helps ... I did put in a request for some info on whether or not this step is necessary. I'll post the answer if it surfaces.

Good Luck,
Saands
saands is offline  
Old April 23, 2001, 11:18 PM   #10
Romulus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2001
Location: Kettle Moraine country
Posts: 865
Saands, thanks for taking the time...didn't expect you to do research, I thought you might know off the top of your head. On whether 375 degrees farenheit can affect the heat treatment of steel, I'll do that bit of research myself...he he, thanks again.

Wallew, I appreciate your input. I understand that a bead blasted blue finish can be mistaken for a manganese phosphate jet black parked finish, but I'd like to achieve the gray-green tone of parkerizing, the old GI look, the classic patina that you get with zinc phosphate.

Thank you both
Romulus is offline  
Old April 24, 2001, 10:15 PM   #11
saands
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,563
Romulus ... Now THAT ... I know off the top of my head! No ... even if the heat treated steel was SUPER hard. If we were talking about a sample that had just been quenched from a high temperature hardening, 375 might start the tempering process ... which would be good, but most tempering, even of knife blades which are trying to end up REALLY hard, go a fair bit past 375 F. The action should already be tempered well beyond that state.

Good luck,
Saands,

ps ... I would not have looked it up if I wasn't interested myself ... no worries! Got honest technical questions? Ask! I might have the answer on the tip of my tongue, and I might not have the answer right away ... but if it is an interesting question ... to me , I'll find the answer eventually! I'm more curious than your average bear.
saands is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08169 seconds with 7 queries