The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Lock and Load: Live Fire Exercises

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 26, 2001, 04:07 PM   #1
airpw
Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Posts: 24
Was looking at both for Conceal Carry Protection class. Wondering if anyone has taken a course at either one?
airpw is offline  
Old February 27, 2001, 10:20 AM   #2
M1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 2000
Posts: 4,055
Ask again end of next week. I just signed up for Sigarms.

I've previously taken a defensive carbine class at S&W. Wasn't that impressed. Too much square range work. Little work with reactive targets. Not enough movement. Too many "war stories." Not enough rounds downrange.

M1911
M1911 is offline  
Old March 4, 2001, 04:33 PM   #3
airpw
Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Posts: 24
So M1911, how was the course?
airpw is offline  
Old March 8, 2001, 12:24 PM   #4
M1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 2000
Posts: 4,055
Just got back last night from SigArms Concealed Carry course (not the advanced concealed carry -- only stayed for 3 days, not 5). If I get a chance tonight, I'll post more details. In summary, though, two thumbs up.

I've been to LFI-1, LFI-2, and S&W defensive carbine. LFI-1 is a must from the legal standpoint. But I think the SigArms Concealed Carry class was more useful to me than LFI-2.

SigArms Academy has excellent instructors and an oustanding facility.

M1911
M1911 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06548 seconds with 9 queries