The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old February 17, 2014, 10:55 PM   #1
Dc777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2013
Location: South West, Alabama
Posts: 605
.223 WSSM. What is it good for?

Although I just turned 26 today I haven't followed suit with people my age and jumped on board with others and gotten a short mag rifle. I have only pulled the trigger on one once, and that was a .300 short mag.Well tonight someone offered me a browning A bolt in .223wssm in exchange for my Remington 700 .243. In my ad I stated that I wanted to trade for a larger caliber but this guy has offered me a smaller one and I find myself being curious about it. So what can a .223 short mag be used for? I'm a deer hunter. I do not shoot at long distances even when target shooting. What is the point of a short mag? All I know after a quick search is cabelas is out of the ammo and it seems pricey. Any insight? Thanks fellas.
__________________
NRA member

Paintings were made to look at, and guns were made to be shot. If you aren't going to use them as they are intended for, get rid of them and buy a Picasso.
Dc777 is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 01:54 AM   #2
trg42wraglefragle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 836
It can be used on small/medium sized game, goats fallow and fallow deer will be easy with the right bullet.

It'll be best at varmints though, rabbits, coyotes, crows, ground hogs etc.
It was designed as a varmint round, more or less equivalent to a 22-250, a little faster, but really didn't offer any major advantages and many disadvantages, so it didn't catch on.

The absolute best use for one, is too wear out your barrel way faster than standard 223, cause you hours of sleepless night with the cost and availability of ammo, and even brass isn't very common.

If a shooter was a reloader and wanted something different it'd be great, but the average Joe it isn't a wise choice. For your needs it really isn't what you would want.
trg42wraglefragle is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 02:15 AM   #3
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,474
It's a bad trade, walk away quickly. Not that the .223 WSSM is a terrible round just that if you're not into reloading don't bother. I'm pretty sure both Winchester and Browning no longer chamber rifles in it, and ammunition availability will be spotty at best.
__________________
NRA Life Member
The Truth About Guns
taylorce1 is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 07:15 AM   #4
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,962
The 270 and 300 WSM are good rounds that fill a niche and have established enough following to stick around, the others are all but dead. None of the WSSM's are going to make it. Yes, it does offer some speed advantages over standard 223, but this round is destined for the scrap heap in the long run.
jmr40 is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 08:16 AM   #5
Mobuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 2,250
I took one in on trade at a gun show by mistake(didn't have my glasses and misread the caliber). Nice looking rifle but apparently already shot out. 3" groups @ 100 yards from $25/box ammo won't do it for me. Cleaned the heck out of it and resold it to someone who "just had to have one". Sorry dude.
Mobuck is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 10:22 AM   #6
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 1,435
Don't do it. You're trading in the wrong direction for your stated goal and the 223 WSSM is already obsolecent. Unless you are a dedicated handloader / tinkerer, run in the other direction.
natman is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 10:51 AM   #7
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,540
While the .223 short mag is a good cartridge, the .243 is a much better cartridge for Bambi. I might add a larger-caliber rifle, but after tagging a couple of dozen bucks with my own .243, I'd sure not trade.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 11:19 AM   #8
Brian Pfleuger
Staff
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 18,791
For deer, I'd rather have a .243

For varmints, the .223WSSM is a .22-250 on steroids. Support for it is all but gone, so unless you reload and can buy 1000 cases so you have them, don't bother. Neat cartridge, I'd like to have one. Ultra-fast bullets, barrel burner in every sense of the word. 4,500fps would be easy with the right bullet and powder.

Don't bother for deer anyway, when you've already got a .243Win
__________________
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
---
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
-----
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 11:39 AM   #9
Dc777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2013
Location: South West, Alabama
Posts: 605
I don't need the .243 as I hunt with a .300 win mag. I was really thinking that the wood stock browning would bring a higher price than my .243 Remington would. I was thinking I could take the browning and swap it for a gun that I really want.
__________________
NRA member

Paintings were made to look at, and guns were made to be shot. If you aren't going to use them as they are intended for, get rid of them and buy a Picasso.
Dc777 is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 11:42 AM   #10
Sierra280
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 29, 2013
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 569
Pretty much everyone on this thread is on point (when does that happen??!!)

The 223 WSSM is pretty much worthless, by the design concept and theoretical performance it should be the greatest .224 caliber ever created. In practice, it's a disaster. The short fat cartridges don't always reliably feed or chamber, and it's way over bore capacity so barrel life will be an issue; if you are okay with that (if you want an overbore .224) then it is also worth noting that the performance of the 223WSSM still falls short of the 220 Swift (created in the 1930's) and if you really like hot loads, it falls well short of the 220 Swift Ackley.

Not to mention those fat little cartridges have really thick necks, and if you want to use larger bullets or seat them more deeply--oops, so much that nice big powder charge, it won't fit!!

.243 is a fantastic caliber, efficient, adaquate for deer or anything smaller, and ammo is readily available.
Sierra280 is offline  
Old February 18, 2014, 11:44 AM   #11
Brian Pfleuger
Staff
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 18,791
Oh... well my opinion would be the opposite of that idea...

The .243 is a fantastic deer gun while my only purpose for a .30cal magnum would be to trade it for something I actually wanted.

In any case, the Browning is a fairly expensive gun but you're looking at a true niche buyer there. It's not every man's caliber.
__________________
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
---
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
-----
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old February 19, 2014, 01:34 PM   #12
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 1,435
Quote:
I was thinking I could take the browning and swap it for a gun that I really want.
Given the near unanimous negative reaction to the 223 WSSM, I'm not sure what makes you think it would be desirable trade bait.
natman is offline  
Old February 19, 2014, 02:03 PM   #13
JD0x0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 860
.223WSSM isn't bad, but compare it to .243WSSM and you'll realize that there isn't much point to it. It's more overbore, uses lighter projectiles with fairly mediocre BC's, and isn't much faster than the .243

.223 WSSM
Quote:
40 gr (3 g) BT (boat-tailed) 4,352 ft/s (1,326 m/s) 1,683 ft·lbf (2,282 J)
60 gr (4 g) JSP 3,733 ft/s (1,138 m/s) 1,857 ft·lbf (2,518 J)
75 gr (5 g) BT(boat-tailed) 3,378 ft/s (1,030 m/s) 1,901 ft·lbf
.243WSSM
Quote:
58 gr (4 g) VMax 4,068 ft/s (1,240 m/s) 2,132 ft·lbf (2,891 J)
70 gr (5 g) BT 3,707 ft/s (1,130 m/s) 2,136 ft·lbf (2,896 J)
80 gr (5 g) BTSP 3,545 ft/s (1,081 m/s) 2,233 ft·lbf (3,028 J)
90 gr (6 g) SFT 3,280 ft/s (1,000 m/s) 2,151 ft·lbf (2,916 J)
100 gr (6 g) BTSP 3,136 ft/s (956 m/s) 2,184 ft·lbf (2,961 J)
The .243 WSSM is a little faster than the .243 Win, but generally has lower ammo availability and more expensive ammo.
JD0x0 is offline  
Old February 19, 2014, 02:26 PM   #14
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: 1B ID
Posts: 6,817
Don't do it.

Most of what I have to say about it has already been brought up (dying cartridge with little support, stupidly expensive ammo, feeding issues, barrel burner, very little interest from anyone that knows what it is, etc).

All I wanted to add is.... Being a wood-stocked Browning does almost nothing to the value of the rifle. The fact that it's a .223 WSSM is the killer. That rifle is worth almost as much without the barrel.

Think of it as an '80s VW Rabbit. There are 7 people in the U.S. that think it's the greatest car ever made. The other 313 million people know it as nothing more than a nightmare they wish they could forget, or never wish to experience. It doesn't matter if you slap European "Golf GTI" badges on it ... it still has the Rabbit engine.

If you make that trade, without prior arrangements to unload the .223 WSSM, you'll be digging yourself into a hole that may take some time (and a financial loss) to get out of.
__________________
"Such is the strange way that man works -- first he virtually destroys a species and then does everything in his power to restore it."
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old February 19, 2014, 10:49 PM   #15
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 1,435
Quote:
The fact that it's a .223 WSSM is the killer. That rifle is worth almost as much without the barrel.
While I get your point, in fact the super short action used can't be rebarreled to much else other than another WSSM, all of which are as unpopular as the 223 version.
natman is offline  
Old February 19, 2014, 11:42 PM   #16
jimbob86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 6,822
Quote:
.223 WSSM. What is it good for?
Lemmee think ......

1. A decade ago, when gun nuts tended to have more money than sense, it was "to sell, of course!" Now? Not so much.

2. Burning barrels. It is way overbore.

3. Depleting the Earth's supply of unobtainium, used in the manufacture of it's cases.
__________________
TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T."

http://nefirearm.com/
jimbob86 is offline  
Old February 20, 2014, 01:09 AM   #17
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: 1B ID
Posts: 6,817
Quote:
While I get your point, in fact the super short action used can't be rebarreled to much else other than another WSSM, all of which are as unpopular as the 223 version.
That's true. But, most people interested in a WSSM are more likely to want the .243 than the .223. If all else fails... bush and recut the bolt face, and modify the extractor. It's a perfect action for a .223 Remington-class cartridge (pretty much anything under ~2.4" OAL).
__________________
"Such is the strange way that man works -- first he virtually destroys a species and then does everything in his power to restore it."
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old February 20, 2014, 01:50 AM   #18
trg42wraglefragle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 836
So really, unless you are wanting to stand out in the crowd, or are keen for a possible project, stay miles away.

If you want something that's good value for money and something you can just go out and shoot. Then you are barking up the wrong tree.
trg42wraglefragle is offline  
Old February 20, 2014, 10:41 AM   #19
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,474
If you don't want the .243 Win trade if for what you really want. If you make this trade and hope to come out ahead, you'll be taking it in the shorts when you go to get the rifle you really want. There are a few guys out there that want the WSSM rifles and they are few and far between and they want them because they can get them a bargain basement prices to build wildcats off of.

Believe me, if you make the trade the guy that gets the .243 will be laughing all the way home once he is out of sight. I know I would if I could unload any WSSM on an unsuspecting victim for a serviceable .243 Win. It's a good thing you asked around before you made the trade, hopefully we can save you some heart burn in the long run.
__________________
NRA Life Member
The Truth About Guns
taylorce1 is offline  
Old February 20, 2014, 11:09 AM   #20
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 1,435
Quote:
That's true. But, most people interested in a WSSM are more likely to want the .243 than the .223. If all else fails... bush and recut the bolt face, and modify the extractor. It's a perfect action for a .223 Remington-class cartridge (pretty much anything under ~2.4" OAL).
That's a lot of work, certainly beyond the scope of a rebarrel. It would be interesting to see how 223 cartridges would feed with the WSSM action.

If you could do it, it would be a nice rifle. It's a shame Browning/Winchester didn't keep the super short action for the 223 class of cartridge.
natman is offline  
Old February 20, 2014, 12:57 PM   #21
globemaster3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,208
Another +1 to avoiding that trade. The .223 WSSM will not fit your intent.

I'd hold onto the .243. At 26, and hunting in Alabama, at some point you'll probably grow out of your .300 Win Magnumitis and appreciate that .243 more than you do now.
__________________
NRA Life Member
Active Duty USAF 1994-Current
globemaster3 is offline  
Old February 20, 2014, 03:35 PM   #22
Dc777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2013
Location: South West, Alabama
Posts: 605
I'm not going to go for it.
__________________
NRA member

Paintings were made to look at, and guns were made to be shot. If you aren't going to use them as they are intended for, get rid of them and buy a Picasso.
Dc777 is offline  
Old August 15, 2014, 05:12 PM   #23
orddy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 4, 2009
Posts: 6
.223 WSSM. What is it good for?

I have mine in the AR platform and use it pretty much only for prairie dog shooting. For this application it works wonderful. I don't try to see how fast i can shoot bullets but instead i shoot heavier 69gr match bullets at distance with it, which it does well at. For really long shots i go to one of my AR's in 243WSSM which will shoot out too 1000yds accurately on pasture poodles. I reload and also anneal all my cases for case life. I wouldn't bother having a bolt gun though in any WSSM caliber as i think it would be a waste.
orddy is offline  
Old August 15, 2014, 08:24 PM   #24
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,540
See Post #22.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11565 seconds with 7 queries