The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 22, 2013, 12:14 PM   #51
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,059
Dragline,

After a real close inspection of all 3 guns (1 96 and 2 92's) it would appear that the main point of contact is between the front part of the slide were the recoil spring seats and the dust cover rather than the rear lower part of the barrel and the frame. It looks like when the rear of the barrel contacts the frame it may be traveling at a higher speed than the slide when it contacts the dust cover, due to the barrel having been unlocked from the slide earlier in the recoil process. And I could be wrong here also! I'm pretty sure the 96 barrel weighs less than than the 92 barrel and as such carries less inertia when contacting the frame which may lessen this problem. This still doesn't explain the differences in the flatness of the machining in this area.
Guv is offline  
Old December 22, 2013, 12:59 PM   #52
Dragline45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,672
Interesting. I do believe you are right that the 96 barrel is lighter than the 92 barrel, bigger hole for the .40 means more material removed. This is why you often see .22 revolvers heavier than say a .357 revolver. Although I am not sure it carries less inertia as the .40 is a higher pressure round than the 9mm. I still believe your initial theory is correct that too much material was left on the outer edges of that part of the frame/rail which was causing it to be displaced backwards.

Last edited by Dragline45; December 22, 2013 at 01:06 PM.
Dragline45 is offline  
Old December 22, 2013, 10:43 PM   #53
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 5,453
Dragline , It lasted a very short time !!
IIRC I made it from either 4140 or 4340 and heat treated it properly [I'm a metallurgist ] .After that I was cleaning some pistols and curious, I dropped a BHP spring into the pistol .It worked fine and was a stiffer spring .I had explained the whole thing to the fellow I sold it to and he said he never had a problem ! That's when I got the idea the original springs were made for 9mm Glisenti pressures.
Anyway the Walther has a similar locking wedge and I can't remember them having any problem ???
The only Beretta I have now is a nice O/U shotgun , it works fine !
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old January 4, 2014, 08:50 AM   #54
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,059
So no body else has seen this on their Beretta or Taurus?
Guv is offline  
Old January 4, 2014, 02:17 PM   #55
DubC-Hicks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2009
Location: Backwoods, Northern MI
Posts: 425
My brand new M9 has marks similar to those. It just looks like where the steel was formed. I actually got my pistol the day before this thread was posted, so of course I checked it out when I saw this thread. I had only fired 10 rounds from it the first day, but the marks were there. I have about 200 through it now, and it hasn't gotten any worse. I don't think mine are a problem.
__________________
”Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.” ~Unknown
DubC-Hicks is offline  
Old January 4, 2014, 02:19 PM   #56
101combatvet
Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2011
Posts: 81
Mine has close to 9,000 rounds. I've never seen wear like that. I love my Beretta!
__________________
NRA Life
Weapons Instructor
Gunsmith
Competitive Shooter

Last edited by 101combatvet; January 4, 2014 at 02:27 PM.
101combatvet is offline  
Old January 5, 2014, 01:46 PM   #57
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,059
thanks Dub, 101.
Guv is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08911 seconds with 8 queries