The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 30, 2013, 01:45 AM   #26
Chowder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 449
Quote:
I notice op posted once and never returned.
That may be because everyone forgot or didn't notice that the OP was talking about pistol vs. handgun in a very specific excerpt of NY laws lol. Interesting reading non the less.

But if the OP is still wondering from what is says in his/her post it would seem you do not need a license for a handgun made before 1898 that does not use rim fire or center fire cartridges as long as you do not have the ability to load it. Once you have the supplies/equipment to load such a handgun the owner is required to have a license.
Chowder is offline  
Old September 4, 2013, 05:36 PM   #27
StrangeBird1911
Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Posts: 40
Colt's Patent

44 AMP writes
Quote:
Note that Sam Colt's first handgun was patented as a "revolving pistol".
The actual patent is for a "revolving gun", though Colt uses the word pistol to describe his gun. The patent is interesting: http://www.google.com/patents?id=Jy0qAAAAEBAJ
StrangeBird1911 is offline  
Old September 5, 2013, 05:45 AM   #28
darkgael
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,473
Yeah.

I like the debate about the etymology of the terms we use.
Quote:
ALL revolvers are pistols, and always have been. I don't know when the idea took hold that revolvers are not pistols (because they have chambers separate from the barrel), but it apparently has. And those who take their understanding of terms only from modern (and online) dictionaries are often not getting full, or fully accurate information, particularly when referring to terms used in a technical field. They define terms as found in common usage, and common usage is not always (and now days seems to be seldom) technically correct. (look at the various definitions of assault weapon, for a good example of this, a term created only 20 years ago, and misapplied, even by its creators, from day one!)
Agree with that. Yes.
All revolvers are pistols; not all pistols are revolvers.
NYC - a weirdness of its own.
I own two single shot pistols.....on my permit they are both listed as Semi-autos.
They only have two classes of handguns...revolvers and semiautos.
Pete
ps - I have almost given up on the other confusion - people using "caliber" when they really mean "cartridge".
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ...
NRA Life Member
darkgael is offline  
Old September 19, 2013, 11:44 AM   #29
tipoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
One final poke...

A look here will show you the S&W website. Note that under the heading of Handguns on the left that "Pistols" and "Revolvers" are listed separately.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...51_757751_-1_Y

Send angry letters to S&W expressing your outrage! Address them to the "Grumpy Old Man Rants Department"! Alternately the "Department of Back In My Day Complaints" may accept the letter. They will also accept collect calls from a pay phone. No email, texts or tweets. No sexting please.

tipoc
tipoc is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05234 seconds with 7 queries