The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 25, 2013, 05:51 PM   #26
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 5,371
So, will this curb the never ending posts about what handgun caliber is best?
__________________
Lock the doors, they're coming in the windows.
g.willikers is offline  
Old April 25, 2013, 06:12 PM   #27
Old Sourdough 54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Posts: 5
How good?

There is a very small window (so to speak) on the human body that will give a one shot kill.
A short T, eyes down the nose to the upper lip, that's if the target is facing you, the target alters as the body rotates. Then you have a vertical target at two inches wide (spinal column ) and this can be easy or hard to hit depending on how much penetration is needed to reach the target, is it facing you, angled to you or are you shooting from the rear ( the nasty back shot).
These are extreamly small targets to hit at the best of times and they get smaller as the pressure goes up.
Military experience is just what it sounds like, but that does not equate to combat experience. Shooting under pressure and hitting the target is what counts.
Old Sourdough 54 is offline  
Old April 25, 2013, 08:50 PM   #28
ClydeFrog
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,798
Post 17, license holders vs armed/sworn LE officers...

Post 17 took a few of my remarks out of context.
Armed citizens/license holders are not "better" than FBI special agents.
I didn't say that.
My point is that any license holder or armed professional should carry a sidearm or firearm able to deal with the threat.
Will Holden or Haden on Discovery's Sons of Guns had a good line; "A handgun should get you to your next gun."
I say; "In a real critical incident you may not have the gun you want, but you must use the gun you have."
Sworn LE officers(unlike armed citizens or license holders) have a sworn duty to uphold the law & pursuit dangerous criminals. They can carry or request firearms, SMGs, shotguns, rifles, K9, air-support/UAVs, SWAT-SRT, etc.
John or Mary Citizen can't always do that.
A few years ago, the NRA awarded the LE Officer of the Year award to a brave Las Vegas Metro PD officer who was seriously wounded in a botched armed robbery. The off duty LV officer was hit several times & returned fire with a compact .380acp. The bad guys were caught & convicted. The hero cop later returned to full police duty & started carrying his full size sidearm(with 2 full size magazines) off duty too.

ClydeFrog
ClydeFrog is offline  
Old April 25, 2013, 11:59 PM   #29
Dalek
Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2013
Posts: 64
I srsly just don't even.

Having carried for reason and recreation as well as working the business side of the counter of a gun shop... This sort of stuff really makes my head hurt.

From "9mm never stopped anyone" (Yeah, tell that to the folks the Germans shot during WW2) to 1911 is outdated and now "Is .40 enough gun". This is the same noise that had folks running about in search of the latest "Mother Monkey Magnum" shoulder buster and wallet drainer because somehow, 30-06 stopped killing Bambi all of a sudden. Sheesh.

Tends to be, if you manage to have the talent to hit something the baddie needs, right this moment for his continued existence, he falls down or, at the very least stops being an active baddie. I know this is hard in a full-blown panic of a firefight or confrontation but, the facts remain stubborn on the subject. Sure, if I know I am going to a fight, give me a 12 Ga. and some 00 Buck but, that looks funny under my jacket at the mall. As it is, any sidearm I carry serves 2 functions for me.

1. Makes me feel I have some chance if things go very wrong.

2. Forces the baddie to be sure that harming me or those I love is worth some serious harm to him.



Just my 2 cents.
Dalek is offline  
Old May 14, 2013, 06:28 PM   #30
sixgunluv
Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2008
Posts: 92
Update

Here's the link, looks like the .40 just won't do for them.

http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/local/...opping-/nXqBd/

Maybe they should just get serious and go wit the .50AE?

Last edited by sixgunluv; May 15, 2013 at 06:16 PM.
sixgunluv is offline  
Old May 14, 2013, 08:01 PM   #31
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,951
Hmmm. So either the ammo is bad or the guns are inaccurate?

I don't know the range involved, and I understand the stress involved, but it seems to me that hits in "the chest, hip, leg, wrist and possibly in the finger" do not indicate a high firearms skill level on the part of the officer.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old May 15, 2013, 03:52 AM   #32
Waspinator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 396
I think there are a lot of stories that are out there that some people just dont go down. I like this one. It was linked here by another member a few days ago I think. I read this and was blown away.

http://www.policeone.com/patrol-issu...mo-on-the-job/

here are some snips from the article (the police officer was using a .45 glock).

"In this free-for-all, the assailant had, in fact, been struck 14 times. Any one of six of these wounds — in the heart, right lung, left lung, liver, diaphragm, and right kidney — could have produced fatal consequences…“in time,” Gramins emphasizes."

" Gramins recalls. “I tried a couple of ricochet rounds that didn’t connect. Then I told myself, ‘Hey, I need to slow down and aim better.’ ”
When the suspect bent down to peer under the car, Gramins carefully established a sight picture, and squeezed off three controlled bursts in rapid succession. Each round slammed into the suspect’s head — one through each side of his mouth and one through the top of his skull into his brain. At long last the would-be cop killer crumpled to the pavement.


Remarkably, the gunman was still showing vital signs when EMS arrived. Sheer determination, it seemed, kept him going, for no evidence of drugs or alcohol was found in his system.
Waspinator is offline  
Old May 15, 2013, 05:16 AM   #33
thedudeabides
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,030
Sounds like a sound argument for having an AR for defense... or a large capacity shotgun loaded with 00 buck and slugs.
thedudeabides is offline  
Old May 15, 2013, 08:03 AM   #34
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,544
What I don't understand is that is seems to be a surprise to many.

In Fairbrian and Sykes book, Shooting To Live they mention being involved in over 400 shooting while fighting the gangs in Shanghai during the early 40s.

They talk of several incidents of a 1911 45 ACP being emptied into the chest of bandits which afterwards had to be subdued by pistol whipping them after the gun was empty.

Guns aren't magic. How many times have we see deer and other critters absorb a good hit in the vitals yet run a 100 yards of so before they go down. It's more common then not. And that is with a high powered rifle.

Sure their dead, but that doesn't stop them from running away.

The thing is its fear that puts people down more then the shot. They are surprised they're shot, afraid their hurt and stop doing what they were doing.

That's why "drugged up" bandits are harder to put down, not because they are tougher then others, its they don't have the mental capacity to realize they are hit or hurt and may die.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old May 15, 2013, 12:25 PM   #35
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,455
Many people here have made the point that many hits don't mean fast kill. More power and larger calibers are only able to increase the chance that a hit will stop the threat.

The main thing we all need to take away from this is that Many hits or few hits, unless in the head (and that's still depending on the where) or Spinal cord (same thing as to where)will stop someone immediately.

In addition, even a shot to the heart doesn't mean immediate death.
An experienced hunter provide proof of that. Not to mention the many stories of people taking several rounds without going down or even dying.


This guy was shot 23 times and lived http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2010/08/...ased-from-icu/

He was still conscious and holding a firearm he wrestled away from another man as the story seems to tell.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...ticle-1.202470
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Old May 16, 2013, 02:24 PM   #36
Bart Noir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2000
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 1,665
From that cop shootout in Post 32:

Quote:
squeezed off three controlled bursts in rapid succession
That officer must have been trained in the use of single shot bursts......

Or the writer needs to understand guns more.

Bart Noir
__________________
“There’s a rattle in my glove box,
A Federal twelve-gauge slug.” – Adam Carroll in song Porter Wagoner
Bart Noir is offline  
Old May 17, 2013, 12:46 PM   #37
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 11,820
This reminds me of a snippet that Jeff Cooper wrote about one. He described an incident, and then the two questions that seemed to be all important (to some people). I'll paraphrase...

Basically, a female officer meets bad guy at a range of mere feet. Fires entire hicap mag (at least once - or there may have been two female officers, I no longer remember), anyway the jist was that a large number of rounds were fired, and the suspect was hit, once, in the kneecap, which turned out to be enough to keep him from escaping...

Now, the interesting thing, to me, anyway, was the two questions that arose and got the most public attention...and they were...

Is the 9mm suitable for police use?
Are women suitable for police duty?

This was where the focus went. NOT to the (to me) obvious question about how well trained to shoot the officers were. Are we not seeing something similar with the claim that the .40 "isn't good enough?"

Now, I know that shooting under extreme stress is more difficult than any other shooting. And it seems that, on average, well trained shooters (including some, but by no means all police) get around 30% hits, at the best, and of those hits, only a smaller percentage are in the vital zones.

And any individual shooting may be far below (rarely above) that average. Back when the cops carried revolvers, a pair of officers could blaze off a dozen rounds before having to reload. With today's use of hi cap semi autos, that firepower has virtually tripled, apparently without a corresponding rise in overall accuracy.

It is certainly true that guns are not magic swords, and bullets are not the light of decency that causes all evil to isntantly shrivel up and die...

But if your expectations are formed by our entertainment industry, you likely won't know that. What you will "know" is that guns only have to be pointed in the general direction of the bad guy, dispatching them with a single shot or single burst, often at truely implausible distances, and while on the move.

You will know that gunshots fling people across large distances, and can be fired indoors, without any hearing protection, with no consequences.

You will know that while badguys can kill minor characters, they can only (at best) wound the hero. And that same wounded hero can run, climb ladders, and all other manner of physical things without being impaired, even up to the final hand to hand combat that, finally, bests the villian.

And we are all the heroes of our own stories, now aren't we?

No police agency is going to come out and say, "our officers were under trained, paniced, or poor shots". It (no matter what "it" is) cannot be the fault of our brave, heroic officers, who put their lives on the line for you daily...

So, the blame something else. The FBI's final blame of the 9mm being at fault for not stopping the Miami Shootout led eventually to the .40 S&W.

Now, the .40 S&W is being blamed for a failure. Personally, I don't think the round is the thing most at fault.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 10:08 PM   #38
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,455
Quote:
Now, the .40 S&W is being blamed for a failure. Personally, I don't think the round is the thing most at fault.
Can't agree more and for fear of spinning off course to the 'Great Caliber Debate" I'll just say that IMO the 40S&W is as adequate as any service caliber.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 06:26 AM   #39
Glenn Dee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,487
OK so speaking from expereince.

1) IME 90% of people shot with any kind of a handgun will stop, lay down or run away.

2) Most people shot with a handgun will not die.

3) Some people will die right away.

4) Some people will die sometime later.


There will always be exceptions...
Glenn Dee is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10115 seconds with 7 queries