The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 26, 2013, 10:08 PM   #1
wooly booger
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2013
Location: on the edge
Posts: 143
Ruger Number 3

I know this is one of those pie in the sky wishes.
I would love to see Ruger reintroduce the Number 3 in some of the cool new cartridges that are available today....especially the .17 Hornet, .460 S&W, .500 S&W, .480 Ruger. The old chamberings would be great too....22 Hornet, .223.

I had one in .45-70 for a short time and kick myself for getting rid of it. They were cool little rifles that were ahead of their time IMHO.
wooly booger is offline  
Old February 27, 2013, 09:17 AM   #2
chiefr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 1,242
They were great little rifles. I had one in .223. Fit and finish was exceptional.

I asked the question as to why they quit making them many years ago to a Ruger rep. He said, poor demand. If people wanted a singleshot, they would buy the #1 instead.

I thought I would add one question. When did they stop making the #3? Must have been over 30 years ago.

Last edited by chiefr; February 27, 2013 at 09:24 AM.
chiefr is offline  
Old February 27, 2013, 10:33 AM   #3
PetahW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefr

When did they stop making the #3?
1987


.
PetahW is offline  
Old February 27, 2013, 08:18 PM   #4
VTRich
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2005
Posts: 262
Great rifle. I have one in 30-40 Krag. Here is a shot with my No 1, also in 30-40 Krag.

VTRich is offline  
Old February 27, 2013, 08:34 PM   #5
AK103K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2001
Location: PA -- In the shadow of the Shade
Posts: 7,935
I recently inherited my dads old #3 in 45/70. I used to hate the thing when I was was younger, as he didnt reload for it, and all we ever shot out of it were heavy factory loads. After a half dozen or so rounds of that, I always wanted to just throw it in the creek. Its biggest downside, is its stock. Its like shooting a 10/22 or Mini 14, in 45/70.

I was close to just selling it off, when I started looking into reduced loads for it. Its now one of my favorites, and Ive been shooting the snot out of it. 300 grain LRNFP over 14.0 grains of Trail Boss, and its a puddy cat, and an accurate one at that. Fun stuff now.

__________________
“The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he is on.”
― Joseph Heller, Catch-22
AK103K is offline  
Old February 27, 2013, 10:46 PM   #6
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 11,359
I have 3 No.3s, .22 Hornet, .30-40 Krag, and .45-70. Fine little rifles.

On my .45-70, which was my first, (1983) a smart previous owner had a nice ventilated recoil pad installed. It tames the recoil of factory 405grloads nicely. With an equivalent handload, using a 400gr cast bullet, it will put three shots in two holes at 50yds.

And, if you are a recoil junkie, you can push jacketed bullets up to within about 300fps of the .458 Win Mag. In the light Ruger, you might even worry about detaching a retina, but what ever you hit gets hit! And so do you!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old February 28, 2013, 05:47 AM   #7
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,355
darn ruger

Ruger now makes plastic guns that sell cheap. All the old school charm, appeal and mystique that made Ruger what it is, that made it special, died with the old man as far as I'm concerned.

Yeah, they came out with the Ruger Scout....about 10-15 yrs too late. I think I read somewhere that Bill did not like the Scout concept.

About all of their really interesting guns are now discontinued. The .44's, the 96 Levers, Old Army, the No. 3 ...did I hear the shotgun line is done too? And who the blue blazes designed the improved accurized target Mini....yuck.

They are riding the crest of the current madness, but it would not surprise me if the No. 1 goes south as well, .....soon.

A No.3 in .22 Hornet for the novelty, or .223 for the practicality, is on the list, but will likely never happen.
bamaranger is offline  
Old February 28, 2013, 09:56 AM   #8
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,456
I think the 30-40 Krag is an underrated cart.

I'd love to find a #3 in 30-40 to go with my 1898 Krag.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old February 28, 2013, 05:52 PM   #9
McShooty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2012
Location: Northern Missouri
Posts: 338
Keep looking Kraigwy, it will be worth it. I agree the .30-40 is an underrated round. The No. 3, .30-40 that I bought new some years ago has always been a great shooter. I have a couple Springfield Krags and they also shoot well, even with corroded bores, a common feature of Krags, but not as well as the No. 3. The Ruger is also very strong, allowing for a greater range of safe experimentation with handloads. I am afraid prices are going up, and I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Ruger to bring the No. 3 back to market.
McShooty is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07577 seconds with 9 queries