The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 17, 2013, 12:52 AM   #1
Georgian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: SE Georgia
Posts: 141
1851 Richards-Mason Conversion

Hey yall. I just ordered a Cimarron 1851 R-M conversion in .38spl.
Does anyone here have any experience with these conversions? I have
always wanted one, and finally had a chance to order one. I believe
they are one of the most elegant and beautiful revolvers ever made.
Any replies would be greatly appreciated!


__________________
~"Speak softly and carry a big stick"~T. Roosevelt

God Bless
Georgian is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 05:39 AM   #2
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 4,573
I like your taste

In these days of scarse ammo or ammo components, it has been my observation that .38 special is more available at a good price than either .357 and .45 LC.

There is a guy in a shop in Dade City, FL who has a tub of .38 special brass at a dime a piece. So if you decide to reload, that could be a good source. I would be happy to pick some up if you need it.
__________________
Doc

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. Thomas Jefferson
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 09:51 AM   #3
Andyspiros
Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2012
Posts: 37
Beautiful pair of guns you have there. If you don't mind me asking, how much did the conversions run you?
Andyspiros is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 07:07 PM   #4
Roshi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 202
Really enjoying my

Cimarron (Uberti) 51 RM conversion in .38 Spl/Colt after waiting four months to get one.

I did use paint stripper to remove the high gloss clear coat on the grip.

I managed to get ten boxes of Remington .38 Spl ammo at $ 16 a box before they ran out.

When they have it, WalMart's prices are pretty good.

I will agree it is the most elegant cartridge revolver I've ever seen.

Mine came with a tall enough front sight to put it on target at 25 yds.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 51RM L.jpg (164.7 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg 51RM R2.jpg (183.6 KB, 21 views)
Roshi is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 08:04 PM   #5
BerdanSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Location: to close to other houses
Posts: 921
They are beauties, I plan on ordering a RM '51 in .38 this spring and a '72 open top for my dad to give him on his upcoming birthday.

Last edited by BerdanSS; February 17, 2013 at 08:16 PM.
BerdanSS is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 12:23 PM   #6
LeadZinger
Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Posts: 43
Congradulations...

to the expectant owner of a great revolver.

I've had mine for a couple of years and just love it. Like the '51 Navy C&B this is pretty much a point and shoot gun, great balance and very accurate even with the lightest of loads. I alternate shooting the C&B and R-M sometimes at the range and it is difficult to tell the difference.

38Spl is a great round for these guns because you can do alot with it if using BP. Reloading supplies usually are easy to obtain (current period is perhaps exception) and reloading itself is very easy. If you don't reload then factory ammo is usually plentiful and cheap in comparsion to alot of other calibers and the R-M is made to handle modern ammunition.

You made a great choice.
LeadZinger is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06750 seconds with 8 queries