The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 27, 2013, 02:35 PM   #1
ender1981
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2013
Posts: 1
Just bought my first AR-15, What's a good scope (good value)

Just bought a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 (ar-15). I added magpul backup sites, but haven't done anything else besides that. I'll use this for target shooting & and just incase SHTF. Not sure if i want a holo type site, or a scope. I may end up getting both at some point so I can swap them out depending on the use that day.. But for those who have used both, which do you prefer for every day use/prepping?
ender1981 is offline  
Old March 27, 2013, 03:56 PM   #2
Skadoosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,776
If you're on a budget, check out the Burris AR332. If you're looking for a non-magnified reddot-type optic, look at the Lucid HD7 Gen III.
__________________
NRA Life Member (2003)
USN Retired
I think that one of the notions common to the anti-gunner is the idea that being a victim is 'noble'; as if it is better to be noble in your suffering than disruptive in your own defense.
Skadoosh is offline  
Old March 27, 2013, 05:23 PM   #3
Panfisher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 629
For general short to medium range shooting I really like the 1-4 range scopes. Nikon makes a pretty good one and I have a Bushnell 1-4.5 that is pretty darn good. On low setting it is very fast on target, faster than I am with reglar sites, and turned up to 4.5 it ain't bad. Even many of the 2-7 scopes are very good in that respect with better midrange distance magnification.
Panfisher is offline  
Old March 27, 2013, 08:47 PM   #4
Justice06RR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,269
Do you want a magnified scope or a Red dot? For a Red dot sight(RDS) the two best options are Aimpoint and Eotech. The model will depend on your budget. If you are on a tighter budget, a Bushnell TRS or a Vortex should fit the bill.

I would suggest a quality non-magnified RDS first to learn on before moving on to magnified scopes. Better yet, master your iron sights first then your prefered optic.
Justice06RR is offline  
Old March 27, 2013, 11:10 PM   #5
breakingcontact
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 736
I like the 1-4X scopes too, but for less money you can buy a quality fixed power 3 or 4X scope.

Not very tacticool but practicool.
breakingcontact is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 12:25 PM   #6
sundog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 1999
Location: Green Country, OK
Posts: 730
I like the Nikon M-223 Rifle Scope 1-4x 20mm BDC 600 Reticle and the matching mount.
__________________
safety first
sundog is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 02:26 PM   #7
Erno86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 554
The Burris 332 ain't so bad. I also have a Burris Tactical XTR 1-4X, 3Omm tube, with a Burris FastFire Red Dot mounted on top. The turrents on the XTR are a bit mushy...but otherwise, it is a good scope. The FastFire comes with a dustcover.

Midway has a flyer sale on the Burris Tac 30, 1-4X, with a FastFire mounted on top; along with a P.E.P.R. mount.
Erno86 is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 02:52 PM   #8
Venom1956
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 3,026
Reddots belong on ARs. Especially if you expect to do any close combat shooting.

Red dots of various quality are readily available from sub $50 to over $1k. Find a few in your price range post em here and We'll help you pick whats best for you.

PS those burris sights that skadoosh mentioned look nice. I just hate how everything has the integrated riser for an AR nowadays... Sometimes people want optics like that on OTHER GUNS!
__________________
E-Shock rounds are engineered to expend maximum energy into soft targets, turning the density mass into an expanding rotational cone of NyTrilium matrix particles, causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system.- Yeah I can do that.
I guarantee you will know it if a bicyclist hits your house going 1000 mph.
Venom1956 is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 03:05 PM   #9
Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 3,664
Burris MTAC 1-4x24 or the MTAC 1.5-6x40.

http://swfa.com/Burris-MTAC-Rifle-Scopes-C3927.aspx
__________________
Pilot
Pilot is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 03:54 PM   #10
Ridge_Runner_5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,894
Trijicon ACOG TA01NSN
Ridge_Runner_5 is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 07:05 PM   #11
Skadoosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,776
I really like the Burris AR332, but I dispensed with the rails on my scope.

__________________
NRA Life Member (2003)
USN Retired
I think that one of the notions common to the anti-gunner is the idea that being a victim is 'noble'; as if it is better to be noble in your suffering than disruptive in your own defense.
Skadoosh is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 07:47 PM   #12
Kirk D
Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 1999
Posts: 78
My first "AR" scope was a Nikon M-233 2-8x, Nikon 233 mount and rings, which worked well. But for me the reticule was never clear and sharp for some reason.

Then bought a EOtech 512. Very nice "scope", but the dot in the middle, and the ring around it, looked a little like "stars" around it. Did a bunch of stuff trying to find out what was going on, until I put my glasses on. The EOtech looked exactly it's supposed to, like in all the pictures in the internet look like it. I hadn't even mounted the Eotech... only put the batteries in and used a half hour to find out why it wasn't working right.

I almost never use my glasses and don't I don't won't want to have my glasses just to use my AR. I can't see things close up very well, but not great in long away.

I finally bought a Leupold Mark AR Mod 1 3-9x Mil Dot. That's a great scope, I don't have to use my glasses <g>, and isn't much more expensive than the Nikon I purchased.

I'm very happy with everything I have on my AR now, though I have to sell those first two scopes

Last edited by Kirk D; March 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM.
Kirk D is offline  
Old March 29, 2013, 11:51 PM   #13
NWPilgrim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,152
For a heavy duty red dot (excellent for close quarters shooting, <100yds) the Aimpoint PRO is the best value at $400. Primary Arms has a good reputation for lower cost red dots and good customer service (about $100). I have a Bushnell Microdot red dot and it is smaller than the Aimpoint so it is not as fast on target but it has worked well and is more like $50.

For scopes I would go with the 1-4x scopes. They are more compact than the 3-9x and cheaper and more suited for the 0-200 yd shooting. Weaver, Nikon, Vortex, Primary Arms, etc. should find them for $150 - $250, plus $75 for a mount. I like the Wilson Combat mount, but the Nikon 223 mount looks good too. Illuminated reticle will put you into the $400 and up range.
__________________
"The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone. ... The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition."
- James Madison
NWPilgrim is offline  
Old March 30, 2013, 03:14 AM   #14
chadio
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2011
Posts: 664
Leupold Mark AR 1.5-4X20

made in U.S.A.
sight picture is big and bright
last time I checked, they were selling for $279
__________________
Ex - Navy, Persian Gulf Veteran. Loved shooting the M14, 1911, M60, M2
chadio is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10257 seconds with 9 queries