The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 28, 2013, 01:00 AM   #26
medalguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,017
I hate the term "gun show loophole." Why don't we start taling about the "kitchen loophole" or the "back of the truck loophole"? It's the same thing.

And I thought we were innocent until proven guilty. Why should we have to submit to ANY kind of background check in order to buy or sell a legal commodity?
medalguy is offline  
Old January 28, 2013, 02:05 PM   #27
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 10,045
Quote:
Nothing has changed,except the focus onto semi autos "assault weapons", and that only because of the high profile mass killings done in very tiny numbers using them.
Actually, the change in focus was a deliberate one, and it didn't really have much to do with mass killings. The movement to restrict handguns had stalled out, and the idea was to invent the term "assault weapon" and make those the issue:

Quote:
Although handguns claim more than 20,000 lives a year, the issue of handgun restriction consistently remains a non-issue with the vast majority of legislators, the press, and public. (...) Assault weapons (...) are a new topic. The weapons' menacing looks, coupled with the public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons (...) can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.
__________________
In the depth of winter I finally learned that there was in me an invincible summer.
--Albert Camus
Tom Servo is offline  
Old January 28, 2013, 02:25 PM   #28
lcpiper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2011
Posts: 1,405
I still think, as loony as some want to make it sound, the only sound defense in all this is the real one.

The Constitution was written so that if need be we the people would be the last guarantee of our own freedoms. The fact that some want to attack the 2nd Amendment is proof that some want to attack them all. They are just taking advantage of the ignorant to get it done.


And yes, they are supposed to be dangerous.


As our good friend said "What are we supposed to use man, Harsh Language?"
__________________
Colt M1911, AR-15 | S&W Model 19, Model 27| SIG P238 | Berreta 85B Cheetah | Ruger Blackhawk .357MAG, Bearcat "Shopkeeper" .22LR| Remington Marine Magnum SP 12GA., Model 700 SPS .223
lcpiper is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06439 seconds with 7 queries