The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 12, 2013, 06:20 AM   #26
hodaka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,822
2400 is what I've gone to for my 30 carbine loads. Need to buy some today at the LGS.
hodaka is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 12:58 PM   #27
Cary
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 110
I am loading 158 gr lswc's in a S&W model 19 with 4" barrel. Loading medium to medium heavy loads. Nothing super hot.
There have been a lot of good powders mentioned here to meet your need. They only thing I would add is that W296 and H110 are two powders that are not to be loaded down very much. They should be used in the high end loads only. The others mentioned including AL2400 can be down loaded safely. Some may not perform as well when down loaded but they will not be unsafe.
Cary
__________________
Shooters. We are a community. United we stand divided we fall.
Cary is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 09:33 PM   #28
kimbers rule
Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2012
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 95
Nope. 2400 is proven. Id recomend not using mag primers unless you are using ww296 or h110. Blue dot is a fine powder for .357 mag. But if you have 2400 I think it will make you happy. There are powders that make less muzzle flash, but they are not magnum powders.
kimbers rule is offline  
Old January 13, 2013, 12:47 AM   #29
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,891
I find that with 296 a magnum primer is unnecessary IF you use a pretty heavy crimp and have adequate neck tension.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old January 13, 2013, 11:20 AM   #30
dahermit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near Ohio, Indiana.
Posts: 3,505
Started using 2400 in the .44 Magnum (Kieth load of 22 grains under a 245-250 grain cast Kieth bullet.) in the middle sixties. It was notorious for leaving large amounts of unburned powder. If it is not still leaving unburned powder (I do not have or load for a .44 Magnum anymore), the formula has been likely changed, so 2400 now may/may not be exactly the same.
In regard to the .357, I find that with the cases nearly full when using my Dillon 550B, powder grains are jarred out of the cases when I advance the system. Annoying as heck inasmuch as I have to slow the loading process way down to avoid it. If I wanted to do things that slow, I would use my single-stage press. Other than that, 2400 seems to work well in the .357 with cast bullets.
__________________
Sometimes you get what you pay for, sometimes you only pay more for what you get.
Three shots are not a "group"...they are a "few".

If the Bible is the literal, infallible, unerring word of God...where are all those witches I am supposed to kill?
dahermit is offline  
Old January 13, 2013, 08:44 PM   #31
Lemmon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Rural South Carolina
Posts: 411
Long time ago I used and liked Winchester 630 long gone.

Long time ago I used and liked Winchester 630 long gone. The old Hornady manual gave some hot loads........

Lemmon from Rural Fairfield County South Carolina
Lemmon is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07329 seconds with 7 queries