The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 10, 2013, 06:12 PM   #1
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,168
Bills in the 113th Congress, 01/10/2013

I have not read these in depth, but they sort of jumped out at me as deserving of our attention:

1) H.R.34 -- Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2013

2) H. R. 35 -- To restore safety to America's schools.

3) H.R.65 -- Child Gun Safety and Gun Access Prevention Act of 2013

4) H.R.93 -- Fire Sale Loophole Closing Act

5) H.R.117 -- Handgun Licensing and Registration Act of 2013
__________________
A gunfight is not the time to learn new skills.

If you ever have a real need for more than a couple of magazines, your problem is not a shortage of magazines. It's a shortage of people on your side of the argument. -- Art Eatman
Spats McGee is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 06:13 PM   #2
Woody55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
Thanks.
Woody55 is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 07:47 PM   #3
wally626
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 31, 2009
Posts: 635
HR35 is repeal of the safe schools act.

No chance of passing but good bill.
wally626 is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 07:50 PM   #4
Isk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 2011
Location: Alaska
Posts: 182
Way to go H.R. 35!
__________________
The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. -James Burgh
Isk is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 08:16 PM   #5
Dr Big Bird PhD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 778
Summarized:

HR 34 - License required to purchase and hold firearms.
HR 35 - CCWs allowed for school employees to have firearms on school grounds
HR 65 - Raises age to buy firearms to 21, everyone needs a gun lock/storage, more government funding for gun safety/fear programs
HR 93 - Harsher penalties for licensed FFLs who have had their license revoked
HR 117 - Handgun Registration, mandatory


34 and 117 are easily unconstitutional, and I thoroughly oppose it.
35 makes me hip hip hooray
65 doesn't do anything to me, and it wont really change anything at all. I can see it passing, and I havent decided how much i dislike it yet.
93 i cant comment on. Can someone who works for an FFL comment?
__________________
I told the new me,
"Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'"
But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back."
Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor
Dr Big Bird PhD is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 12:02 AM   #6
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 10,537
Actually, HR 93 is pretty troubling.

Quote:
It shall be unlawful for a person who has been notified by the Attorney General that the Attorney General has made a determination to revoke a license issued to the person under this chapter to import, manufacture, or deal in firearms, or to deny an application of the person to renew such a license, to--

`(i) transfer a business inventory firearm of the person--

`(I) into a personal collection of the person; or

`(II) to an employee of the person, or to an individual described in section 923(d)(1)(B) with respect to the person; or

`(ii) receive a firearm that was a business inventory firearm of the person as of the date the person received the notice.
So, what happens to the guns the dealer paid for and legally owns?

FFL's can be revoked for many reasons, not all being acts of malfeasance. Likewise, a denial could be a result of paperwork simply being submitted improperly.

This one's vindictive, and it doesn't really serve any utility to the general public.

HR 34 is the Blair Holt act, that Rep. Rush introduces every year. Notice the lack of cosponsors. HR 117 also lacks any support.

(Rush went AWOL from the Army in 1968, and he went on to found the Illinois chapter of the Black Panthers, who kicked him out within a year. In 1969, he was jailed on weapons charges.)

As far as HR 65, I'm a bit confused. Lee wants to append something about "semiautomatic assault weapons" to 922, but that term doesn't appear anywhere, and she fails to define what an "assault weapon" is. So, um...yeah. Also, no cosponsors.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07465 seconds with 7 queries