The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 8, 2013, 07:22 AM   #1
Famas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 126
Facebook, censorship and the 2nd Amendment

I have noticed on various forums, an increasing amount of talk by members describing how Facebook suspended or deleted accounts of users who took a pro-2nd Ad view and/or frequently posted pro-RKBA messages.

Is this true? Has anyone else been the victim of such censorship on FB?
Famas is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 07:28 AM   #2
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,967
I'm on FB daily, and my wall is covered in 2A stuff. I also see the NRA, SAF, Gun Owners, and a whole slew of other gun-related stuff in my feed. I share or repost gun-related stuff on an almost-daily basis. If they're shutting stuff down, I don't know what it is, or why.
__________________
A gunfight is not the time to learn new skills.

If you ever have a real need for more than a couple of magazines, your problem is not a shortage of magazines. It's a shortage of people on your side of the argument. -- Art Eatman
Spats McGee is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 07:36 AM   #3
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,754
I've also posted some extremely pro Second Amendment materials on my FB page.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 07:44 AM   #4
Closing The Gap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2013
Location: Michigan/Nevada
Posts: 250
I have been posting a TON of pro material and at one point received one of those auto responses. It said my ability to post has been suspended for 24-48 hours due to excessive posting. I had posted no more than any other day in the past month and a half. I assume someone on my list didn't like what I was posting and flagged me. However the next day I went right back to it. No further issue to report so far.
__________________
Half the country hates my business, the other half my hobby.
Closing The Gap is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 08:18 AM   #5
TJMehaf
Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2010
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 37
I have not seen any issues and I post things daily on my page.
__________________
Umarex/Colt 1911-22 Gov't, 92fs 9mm, DW cbob .45, Browning Buckmark, S&W 629 6", P238 Nitron
NRA Life Member
ISRA Member
TJMehaf is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 08:30 AM   #6
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague County, Texas
Posts: 10,346
Based on the amount of Pro-2A stuff I see posted, NO, not true.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher."
-- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 09:08 AM   #7
Woody55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
My activity feed is flooded by pro 2A stuff published by "friends". So, I haven't seen any evidence of censorship. I've actually unfriended some of these people because I'm tired of it.

Thank you for having the good sense to do a little research before just spreading the rumor. Unjustified paranoia is not conducive to problem solving.
Woody55 is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 09:49 AM   #8
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 2,955
I've never had a problem with the actual site doing anything & I'm loudly, firmly, but always politely pro gun, pro 2nd amendment.
Individuals with "feeds" rather than members posting however have deleted posts in that stream, & "blocked" or "Ignored" me.

If thats whats happening its not FB per se, but individuals with moderator-like privelages in specific areas.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 11:06 AM   #9
wingman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2002
Posts: 2,074
I won't use face book because I believe it does more harm then good especially to our youth and I fail to understand why adults would post pictures on line of firearm or themselves to people who are not really friends.

FB/Goggle both very far left IMO.
wingman is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 12:24 PM   #10
Dr Big Bird PhD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 778
I don't think its inherently because of corporate censorship. I think it is because other people are flagging and complaining about your posts. After too many they technically have to respond.

It's the environment of FB in general. It's a lot easier to trying and anonymously censor the opposition.
__________________
I told the new me,
"Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'"
But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back."
Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor
Dr Big Bird PhD is offline  
Old February 8, 2013, 09:37 PM   #11
SycoPath
Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2012
Location: Emerald City
Posts: 24
I haven't had a problem with FB since I rarely login to it. I have noticed that my ISP is sending most of my gun related email to the trash file no matter how many times I change the senders address from "trash" or "spam".
__________________
"Sometimes it's better to be silent and only look stupid than to say something that proves it."
SycoPath is offline  
Old February 9, 2013, 12:33 AM   #12
jason_iowa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
Some of the pages I frequent have banned me from commenting on their page. I just unfollow em. If they cant handle intelligent debate then the heck with them. They will simply fool themselves into believing the whole world is on their side until they get defeated.
jason_iowa is offline  
Old February 9, 2013, 01:56 AM   #13
SHE3PDOG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 961
I have the same problem as jason. If I try to put a little logical argument into any of the gun control groups on FB, I get banned pretty quickly. That being said, I do keep it civil. The members just insult me instead of trying to formulate a coherent basis for a political ideology. Given that experience, I have decided that the vast majority of them must simply be sheep following the national media.
__________________
Semper Fi

Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms
SHE3PDOG is offline  
Old February 9, 2013, 02:57 AM   #14
nate45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,746
I rarely mention gun rights, politics, etc on facebook. Like it or not the NRA is seen as a political organization who oppose President Obama and his cohorts by many. Several of my co-workers and customers are Obama supporters, so being too vociferous about the second amendment might offend them.


As far as I know though, most all of, if not all of my 150+ facebook friends are pro-second amendment and I actually know all of them quite well IRL, so I feel confident saying that. I try often to change the perception that the NRA is a partisan political organization, but I have to do it tactfully.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."- Thomas Jefferson
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
(>_<)
nate45 is online now  
Old February 9, 2013, 04:19 AM   #15
SHE3PDOG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 961
Most of my FB friends have similar views on the second amendment as well. Also, anyone that did a minimal amount of searching would see that the NRA, under their political standard, is a gun rights advocacy group. They have given "A" ratings to Democrats and "F" ratings to Republicans in times past, so while the individual leadership and membership may lean one way, the organization as a whole is relatively balanced. This, of course, is not to say that the NRA is purely a political organization, as many people seem to perceive it nowadays, because they do have other branches such as firearms education. I'm sure that I am preaching to the choir for the most part though.
__________________
Semper Fi

Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms
SHE3PDOG is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11135 seconds with 9 queries