![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 195
|
Good .22 Pistol
What's a good .22 to use for target practice at the range?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,488
|
I own quite a few .22lr handguns and my favorites for target are the S&W mod 41s.
Great pistol.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 17, 2006
Posts: 36
|
Sig 1911 .22
I just took my new Sig .22 out today and it's awesome. Very reliable and very accurate out to 20 yards. Highly recommend.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,179
|
A used Ruger Mark II or a Browning Buckmark.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 24, 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,756
|
The latest addition to my collection is a Ruger MKIII 22/45. I would highly recommend one.
__________________
Formally Teifman1948 Please visit the link below to help my friends daughter in her battle against cancer http://www.reesesroad.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 3,152
|
Ruger MK II or MKII era 22/45. The Browning Buckmark is also a good choice, but with four Ruger MK II's and thousands of accurate and reliable rounds downrange with my Rugers, I see no reason to get one........yet.
__________________
Pilot |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: February 20, 2010
Posts: 91
|
Another vote for the MKII
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 6, 2011
Posts: 428
|
In an auto I would take a Browning Buckmark. I like
the Ruger MK but, they have a special way to field strip them. Have you looked at a Ruger single six wheel gun yet? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Posts: 162
|
Personal favorite for me is a S&W M&P .22 pistol. It's built by Walther I think, but boy can that thing shoot!
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: November 27, 2012
Posts: 1
|
I would also vote for the Browning Buckmark.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 21, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,490
|
If you are a strict budget, I'd go with the Ruger 22/45 or the Mark III, 5.5" with bull barrel.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2011
Posts: 1,146
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Western Victoria
Posts: 62
|
Another voter for the Ruger Mk111 22/45
__________________
You gonna pull those pistols or whistle dixie?
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 105
|
Beretta Neos. Cheap, accurate, and eats everything you feed it. Easy to clean, and looks good too (this last point is in the eye of the beholder).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus that ate your iPhone. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,549
|
As we can see by some of the response's in this thread accuracy is a relative term, so is cost. I don't think their is very many that would argue that the S&W 41 is very near top of the list but you'll pay thru the nose for em too. On a more budget minded area I'll throw in a couple more votes for the Ruger MK's and Buckmarks. And no, the MK's aren't in the least bit difficult to strip down. Some folk just need to set down the gun and back slowly away before they hurt themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 144
|
I like my Mark III Target. It felt better in my hand than either the 22/45 or the Buckmark, but any of those are fine pistols.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2001
Posts: 699
|
For casual target practice at the range, it is REALLY hard to beat the value of the Ruger MK series or the Browning Buckmark. I've heard a lot of people who feel the same way about the S&W Model 21. You can get new versions of all three for between $300 and $550, depending on options/styles.
I would LOVE to have a S&W Model 41, but I don't want to spend $1000 on a .22lr when I have shaky hands and can't maximize the accuracy potential. I'd rather have a Ruger MK II/III 22/45 and $700 worth of .22lr ammo. I would also love to have a Hammerli or other .22lr olympic quality handgun, but I can't afford that. I have a Mark II 22/45. It is not complicated to fieldstrip, as long as you read the manual and follow the same steps. I have it apart in less than 10 seconds. It isn't as easy as a Glock, but it is just as easy as any of my 1911s, and it doesn't require a special tool/wrench/wire unlike my 1911s. HOWEVER, I have read that the Mark III versions are more complicated.
__________________
Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin. Its the triumphant twang of a bedspring. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 288
|
Beretta 87 Target...well made and very accurate !
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 7, 2006
Location: Richfield Ohio
Posts: 86
|
I vote for the Ruger MKII.
__________________
NRA Life Member ![]() Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club Member 72-75 Don't take life too seriously, No one makes it out alive anyway. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2012
Posts: 7
|
S&W M&P 22lr. is my new favorite.Outshoots any .22 I have ever known.Simple to clean up and $299 on sale at Academy.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 267
|
Ruger (Mk I, II, III) or Browning (Buckmark, Challenger), so many variations of these reliable reasonably priced pistols.
Last edited by Guv; December 29, 2012 at 10:33 AM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,422
|
How much do you want to spend and how accurate do you want?
The current stuff does not touch the model 41 S&W accuracy wise, but you will pay $700 or so for a used one (not that you can wear them out). |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 132
|
High standard makes a good one. On the cheaper side go with a Ruger Mk I II or III. The Sig 1911-22 was pretty fun too.
Ike Sent from my C771 using Tapatalk 2 |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Oregoncoast
Posts: 1,463
|
Look out for 1911 look alike .22's that have come out lately, many are made of zinc based pot metal.
You can't go wrong with a Ruger mkIII, if you are willing to remove the mag safety and some other lawyer garbage. Accurate? In spades! Rugged? There too, and after the pot metal guns have turned into piles of zinc pest dust the Ruger will still be good. If you do want a 1911 look alike RIA is making some 22's out of 4140 steel throughout. That alone means they are infinitely better than the zinc guns that are being foisted on ignorant consumers now days.
__________________
I have CNC produced 416 stainless triggers to replace the plastic triggers on Colt Mustangs, Mustang Plus II's, MK IV Government .380's and Sig P-238's. Video on installation in Sig;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jh2v_-87DRM |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,491
|
Brownig Buckmark, Ruger MK III, Beretta Neos, or for the price of all three combined you might find a used S&W Model 41 as mentioned earlier.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|