The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old December 19, 2012, 06:43 AM   #1
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,020
good watercooler arguments to win hearts and minds

If they confiscated every gun in America, what's to keep the next disturbed 20 year old with Asperger syndrome from taking his truck, SUV, or car down to the schoolyard when kids are huddled around before the bell rings or at recess or at a soccer field and mowing them down like so many stalks of corn? Will we then have an outcry to ban the automobile and every related job that goes with it? Where was the outcry to outlaw the jumbo jet after 911? It's not about hardware. We have to keep guns away from the crazies and criminals only.
kcub is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 06:52 AM   #2
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,020
And speaking of criminals, for gun control to work on them they have to obey the law. What's the definition of a criminal? Someone who does not obey the law.
kcub is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 08:12 AM   #3
Sport45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,072
it was illegal for him to kill his mother.

It was illegal for him to steal her guns.

It was illegal for him to take the guns into the school.

Would one more law have helped?
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter.
Sport45 is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 08:30 AM   #4
Brian Pfleuger
Staff
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 18,791
These events are:

1)Not new
2)Not uniquely American
3)Very often do not involve firearms
4)Claim the lives of about 15 kids a year, out of 15.8million, about 600 kids a year die in school transportation accidents
5)In other countries, the lunatics use knives and swords and kill just as many
6)In other countries, the lunatics use explosives and regularly kill far, far more.

The answer, to an attempted attack, is individuals being able to defend themselves. Even 4, 5, 10 children tragically killed in a firefight would be preferable to 20 waiting to be slaughtered in turn, yes?

The answer to intervening BEFORE an attack is far more complex.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 09:12 AM   #5
CWKahrFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2010
Posts: 1,822
Isn't the practice of posting signs around a school which advertises that it's a "Gun Free Zone" kind of a dumb idea?

Isn't the subtext something like;
"Murder and mayhem on your mind? Come on in... Nothin' to stop you here!"
__________________
What did Mrs. Bullet say to Mr. Bullet? ... "We're having a BeeBee!"...

IF THE SHOE FITS, WEAR IT!... IF THE GUN FITS, SHOOT IT!
CWKahrFan is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 10:13 AM   #6
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,130
1) Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people, including 19 daycare-age children, and wounded over 600 more. He used a box van, fertilizer and racing fuel. We haven't banned box vans, fertilizer or racing fuel.

2) The 9/11 terrorists killed thousands using box cutters and airplanes. Neither has been banned.

3) If you want to talk about banning something, let's understand what we're talking about. Rifles with a burst- or full-auto setting are already heavily regulated. Semi-automatic rifles without such settings are all functionally similar: one bullet per trigger pull. The 1994 federal AWB restricted weapons based primarily on cosmetic appearances. Go run image searches for a Mini-14 Ranch Rifle and then for a Mini-14 Tactical. Those two rifles use the same cartridge, same magazine, are equal in accuracy. It doesn't make sense that only one would have been covered by the AWB. (Caution: The danger here is that you'll get a "then let's ban them both" response. You could also compare to something like the Winchester Model 100, which is also semi-auto, but chambered in a more powerful round (.308) than an AR-15 (.223).)

4) The Columbine shooting happened while the AWB was in full force and effect.

5) Columbine, Sandy Hook, Jonesboro, Virginia Tech, Appalachian Law School -- These all happened in Gun Free Zones. (I vote that we rename them Fish-In-A-Barrel Zones.)

6) One of the first documented assault weapons was a rock. Rocks have probably killed millions over the millenia. It's still legal to carry a rock everywhere you go, open or concealed.
__________________
A gunfight is not the time to learn new skills.

If you ever have a real need for more than a couple of magazines, your problem is not a shortage of magazines. It's a shortage of people on your side of the argument. -- Art Eatman

Last edited by Spats McGee; December 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM.
Spats McGee is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 09:05 PM   #7
357 Python
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2007
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 691
Today they are called "Criminals", a $500 word for a $5 no account. When are we going to call them what best describes them, the same thing they were called 120+ years ago "OUTLAWS"? They do live OUTside the LAW.
357 Python is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 09:59 PM   #8
Scouse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2011
Posts: 132
Aspergers . . .

Hi - not strictly firearm related, but I feel it is worth saying. Mods, I am sure you will delete away if you feel necessary.

Just wanted to respectfully suggest avoiding falling afoul of the late trend to linking what happened with either autism or aspergers - which we can thank the ever appalling media for.

Think back to when you were a kid, remember the "strange", "weird", "didn't fit in" children? They were always the vulnerable ones, never showed any more (and usually less) violent impluses than their peers?

Those people don't quite understand social interaction the way "normal" people do, they generally need people to watch out for them throughout their lives because they can be incredibly vulnerable. People with mental health problems are known to be FAR more likely to be victims of crime than perpetrators - I strongly suspect the same is true for those with developmental difficulties that fall on the autistic spectrum.

People engaging in debate on all this gain absolutely nothing by contributing to unfounded fears which always compound our misunderstandings of the most vulnerable people in society.

This guy may have been autistic or have had aspergers - having either of those things does not make one a child killer, no more than does being white for example. Having aspergers also does not make one "crazy" - many live rich, fulfilling lives which contribute to society and the economy.

Just wanted to chuck that out anyway, given the reference to aspergers made in the original post - I am sure not done maliciously by any means, just stresses me out when we get fed ill-thought out crap by the media which becomes receives wisdom in the blink of an eye. Sure we can all relate to that here . . . what with those "assault weapons" and all.
Scouse is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 10:15 PM   #9
jason_iowa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
Asperger syndrome is a a form of autism. The vast majority of which are non violent. I agree with your sentiment I just don't want people going around thinking every kid with autism is dangerous.
jason_iowa is offline  
Old December 19, 2012, 11:33 PM   #10
raimius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 1,331
"We tried a so-called "assault weapon ban" for 10 years. It didn't work. Why do you think the same people want to ban the same guns again? They know it will not lower violent crime rates." Combine that with the "urge to do something...anything" without actually creating useful laws argument and an explanation about what semi-auto rifles are and are not, and how infrequently they are used in crime compared to the number out there.
raimius is offline  
Old December 20, 2012, 10:21 AM   #11
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 10,425
We've already got two threads running on the matter. Please direct discussion there.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09418 seconds with 9 queries