The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 24, 2012, 11:44 AM   #1
buymore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2007
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 257
rimfire ring problems?

I have an older Marlin Model 25M .22 mag. Trying to scope it and it seems like rimfire rings always seem to sit either one side or the other....never top dead center. I'm afraid to put one screw right and one screw left....but it that the answer? I've tried a few different rings and I've experienced this on several bolt action rifles. If I leave it slightly left of top dead center...wondering if I should can't the crosshairs to eliminate parallex?

I thought about filing on the inside of the fixed part of the ring to maek it slide over slightly, but then I may end up ruining the rings.....not expensive but anyone have any solutions?
buymore is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 12:44 PM   #2
Bailey Boat
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 365
Buy a set of Millet steel rings. The base of the ring has an adjustment screw on each side and can be tweaked to your heart's desire. It will also allow for some windage adjustment without using all of the adjustment in the scopes adjustment range. I would also advise (to preserve the scope) that the rings be lapped parallel to the bore to prevent "minor ring marks"......
Bailey Boat is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 09:24 PM   #3
blindhog
Junior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2011
Posts: 11
Another solution is to purchase Burris signature z rings. These rings have offset inserts that will allow both elevation and windage adjustments. They also eliminate the need for lapping.
blindhog is offline  
Old December 24, 2012, 10:56 PM   #4
Sport45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,069
Quote:
If I leave it slightly left of top dead center...wondering if I should can't the crosshairs to eliminate parallex?
No, leave them straight up.

If your scope is 1/8" left of the bore adjust it so the bullet impact is 1/8" right of the crosshair. Then it will be the same 1/8" right for all distances.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter.
Sport45 is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 01:04 AM   #5
solocam72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 221
I just recently bought a savage 93 stainless bull barrel thumbhole stock, I put a redfield scope on it and used leupold PRW rings, I really like the rings, very heavy built and rock solid! My scope sits top dead center
solocam72 is offline  
Old December 25, 2012, 08:29 PM   #6
buymore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2007
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 257
After looking a little closer with my extra eyes on I think I found the problem. The rings are defective......I may have had the same problem prior to this because it may have been this same set of rings! I had an extra pair of silver rings that I threw on and they center up fine....just not high enough to clear the bolt! It appears as though that little piece on the nut side of the rings is sort of flattened and it makes the rings set crooked when tightened. I took that piece off the silver rings and these rings center up fine....same story....not enough bolt clearance. I ordered some new rings and got them a little higher. Should fix everything. Got a different type too. Thanks for all the ideas though.
buymore is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06429 seconds with 9 queries