The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 9, 2012, 11:49 PM   #1
308Gunner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 199
Which 'Tacticool' rifle would you lean toward?

I'm definitely getting a .22 this spring, and I've narrowed it down to two.

The first is the classic, venerable, Ruger 10/22. However, with a twist;

http://www.midwayusa.com/product/567...ynthetic-black

Option #2 is the GSG5, the MP5-clone .22;

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/p...ducts_id/55260

At the end of the day, they're both going to be similar; polymer bodies with a bunch of fake stuff that just looks cool. The first one, however, still has a 10/22 at its heart; just a different stock, when it comes down to it. If I invest in the G36-clone stock kit, they come out to roughly the same price as well.

I still feel like I'm leaning towards the GSG5, just because I have always loved the MP5, and well, let's face it, it's highly unlikely I'll own the real deal, which I guess is the attraction to both of these Either way, they're just going to be used for plinking and range time; not thinking these are going to be magically transformed into 'battle hardened' weapons.
__________________
‘‘To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.’’

— George Mason
308Gunner is offline  
Old November 10, 2012, 12:04 AM   #2
alex0535
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 781
I like the MP-5 one.

Instead of a fake silencer I would rather just have a black heavy barrel.
alex0535 is offline  
Old November 10, 2012, 08:25 AM   #3
TAKtical
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 25, 2012
Location: ohio
Posts: 145
There are many better stocks for the 10/22. Nordic and Troy stocks can be fit with a slidefire. Enough said
__________________
Due to several differences of opinion with staff, I am choosing to no longer do business on this forum. Everyone that has a pending order will need to contact me via email at TakticalHolsters@aol.com Thanks,
-Tom&Tricia
TAKtical is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 12:03 AM   #4
arizona98tj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 975
You do realize the link you put to the 10-22 is just stock and magazine. There is no rifle included.

I wouldn't waste my $$ on either of the two you mentioned (even if there was a rifle with that stock).

I would get a Smith & Wesson M&P15-22. It gives you the same setup as an AR-15 except that it doesn't have a forward assist. (not really necessary for a .22LR)
__________________
stu-offroad.com
Largest Jeep TJ project site on the web!
(now with guns)
arizona98tj is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 07:57 AM   #5
WeedWacker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,530
+1 on the S&W over the 10/22 if you are intending this to be a practice carbine. If you want a plinker I see nothing wrong with the 10/22 but take note that the Ruger is pretty much the least cost effective rifle in creating a practice rifle to use in place of an AR-15 or AK. On the other hand, a 10/22 is a phenomenal platform for an Appleseed specific Tactical Training Rifle and for learning the fundamentals.

The only reason I would take the GSG over the Smith was if my personal defensive carbine was of HK ergonomics. So a 93, 91, or MP5 clone would make the GSG-5 more appealing to me as it would factor into training in those weapon systems.


ETA: Save your pennies and hone your crafting skills and you could get one of these: Vector Arms MP5 Style Rifle

I know it's only semi-auto, but you could SBR it later and you'll save on ammo over that boring full auto.
__________________
- Weed
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs 45 ACP? The answer is 42.

Last edited by WeedWacker; November 11, 2012 at 08:04 AM.
WeedWacker is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 05:24 PM   #6
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 6,813
http://www.legacysports.com/products/cit_m1.html

All I know about it is I want it.
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. You could just donate to the Second Amendment Foundation
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 06:46 PM   #7
Marquezj16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
Between the two, I'd pick the 10-22. It will be more accurate and will function. Plus you did say tacticool. The 10-22 probably has the biggest after market accesories available.

If you want to know about other choices, then check out the M&P 15-22.
You can get it in a rifle or pistol model.
Marquezj16 is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 07:49 PM   #8
rodent.22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2010
Location: virginia woods
Posts: 129
I have the Colt/Umarex OPS, a really fun piece. I also have the M&P 15/22P, which has been discontinued by Smith.
__________________
NRA, VCDL, USAF 1970-76 6200FMS CLARK FIELD,P.I.'71-'72- 18 SOS, NKP, THAILAND '72, BASE FLIGHT,KEESLER AFB,MISS '72-'74, CARSWELL AFB,TX '74-'76
rodent.22 is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 08:14 PM   #9
BillyJack3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2, 2012
Posts: 407
Smith 15-22.
BillyJack3 is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 12:08 AM   #10
308Gunner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 199
Quote:
You do realize the link you put to the 10-22 is just stock and magazine. There is no rifle included.
Yes, I'm aware of that. I'm not an idiot.

Quote:
Nordic and Troy stocks can be fit with a slidefire. Enough said
I have no interest in the slide fire. To me, it's a waste of ammo and money.

Quote:
ETA: Save your pennies and hone your crafting skills and you could get one of these: Vector Arms MP5 Style Rifle

I know it's only semi-auto, but you could SBR it later and you'll save on ammo over that boring full auto.
I would love to get that, but at this point in my life, it's simply not cost effective. Maybe someday. But I assure you, I'm very aware of it

Quote:
If you want to know about other choices, then check out the M&P 15-22.
You can get it in a rifle or pistol model.
I handled a 15-22, and similar .22 AR-15-type rifles, and, to be honest, I really did not care for it. Out of everything I've handled, the GSG was the best for me. Now, I have not shot the 15-22 or GSG; like so many, the only .22 I've had actual range time with is a 10/22.
__________________
‘‘To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.’’

— George Mason
308Gunner is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 11:46 AM   #11
Marquezj16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
Quote:
Out of everything I've handled, the GSG was the best for me. Now, I have not shot the 15-22 or GSG; like so many, the only .22 I've had actual range time with is a 10/22.
If you get a chance, shoot the other two. It may make a big difference on your choice.
Marquezj16 is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 12:18 PM   #12
EdInk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2009
Posts: 3,967
I really like my GSG and would recommend it.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis
EdInk is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 01:49 PM   #13
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: IN
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
308Gunner

Quote:
You do realize the link you put to the 10-22 is just stock and magazine. There is no rifle included.
Yes, I'm aware of that. I'm not an idiot.
I don't think anyone was calling you an idiot. Second, as someone who has run the gamut of aftermarket stcks for the 10/22 platform, I can tell you that while the Archangel Nomad looks really cool, it sucks because you ever put optics on it, you will have to re-zero every time if you want to do a thorough cleaning. The top has to come all the way off... The sights on it leaves much to be desired as well.

If you are only concerned with blasting bricks of ammo while maintaining a shotgun pattern at 50 yards, then this is a good stock.
__________________
"With great power, there must also come great responsibility." - Stan Lee

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old November 13, 2012, 05:36 AM   #14
meatgrinder42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Good Ol' Wisconsin
Posts: 327
I have a 10/22 with the Archangel 'Nomad' (used to be the Marauder) kit on it to make it look like a G36c except with a longer barrel on it. I think it's a pretty cool little tacticool rifle. I even found a set of side rails that were for one of my buddy's airsoft guns that fit right on, which is kind of nice.

Quote:
I can tell you that while the Archangel Nomad looks really cool, it sucks because you ever put optics on it, you will have to re-zero every time if you want to do a thorough cleaning. The top has to come all the way off... The sights on it leaves much to be desired as well.
I have to completely disagree with this. I've had zero issues with my sights wondering on it even after a full disassemble. The sights that were on the top rail also weren't that bad. Yes they're not 'H&k spec' sights but they worked pretty darn well for popping at golfballs and soda cans at the range. I took them off so I wouldn't have them lingering in my optic when I was aiming.
__________________
When I die better bury me deep, two .45s layin' at my feet,
An M16 across my chest, tell Chesty Puller I did my best
meatgrinder42 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09759 seconds with 7 queries