The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 2, 2012, 08:33 PM   #1
Falcon642
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2010
Posts: 314
New GP-100 or Used Redhawk?

So I'm in the market for a woods gun. In my area I can get a new GP-100, 6 inch barrel, .357 mag for $550. Depending on the auction, I can get a used Ruger Redhawk .44 mag for roughly the same price.

I'm pretty set on double action Ruger, not a Taurus fan, and Smith and Wesson is just out of the price range.

So what would you get? I'm not recoil sensitive so the extra oomph of the .44 mag doesn't bother me. For where I live, Washington State, with tiny black bears the .357 makes alot of sense. But we visit either Glacier or Yellowstone every year so grizzlies are an occasional concern.

Thanks for being a sounding board guys.
Falcon642 is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 01:31 AM   #2
Edward429451
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
Your choice seems clear. You want to take enough gun for the biggest critter you may run into. You said you go to big bear country so it seems that the 44 Mag is the better choice.

If you only need 357 power at times, then you can just load light loads for the 44 for those occasions.
Edward429451 is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 01:34 AM   #3
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 6,817
I wouldn't shy away from a used ruger. In fact I haven't in the past.
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. You could just donate to the Second Amendment Foundation
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 02:00 AM   #4
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 2,989
Agreed with both remarks.

Unless the weight of the Redhawk is going to be a discomfort (I do feel it after a while) or then ammo for it too expensive, then go with the .44
__________________
You cannot wake someone who is pretending to sleep. Stop pretending. Wake up.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 03:32 AM   #5
GP100man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Tabor City , NC.
Posts: 1,926
A good holster will make the Redhawks weight more bearable(pun intended) a chesty carry is my prefered for woods bumming or hunting .

Considering ammo for both calibers , if ya shoot any amount at all you`ll have to reload to afford it !!

I like the versatility of both calibers !

All things considered , big animals with big teeth , a caliber that starts with a 4 would surely make me feel a bit more comfortable.

As far as the new/used aspect , check out the used closely & if it meets specs no problem with used.
__________________
GP100man
GP100man is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 09:45 AM   #6
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,928
The Redhawk will give you the most versatility as you can shoot anything from light .44 Special Cowboy Action ammo to the miniature Hiroshima Bombs sold by the likes of Buffalo Bore, Double Tap, Grizzly, and Garrett and anthing in between.
__________________
Smith, and Wesson, and Me. -H. Callahan
Well waddaya know, one buwwet weft! -E. Fudd
All bad precedents begin as justifiable measures. -J. Caesar
Webleymkv is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 11:34 AM   #7
bossman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 996
I think the GP 100 is a fine all around woods gun. I would have no problem buying a used Redhawk either. As GP100man said the chesty carry holsters are a great way to carry through thick underbrush and the gun is easily in reach. I use one to carry my 7 1/2in. Blackhawk around.

I think if I was truly worried about big bears I would be looking for a .454 Casull in the Redhawk. As for shooting for other things beside hunting the .357 will be more cost friendly. Good luck as all of the guns should serve you well.
__________________
NRA life member

When the going gets tough, I just open another beer.
bossman is offline  
Old November 3, 2012, 10:53 PM   #8
Meditator
Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2005
Posts: 92
Shop around a little bit- you should be able to get a lightly used GP100 or even a (Super) Redhawk for under $500. I wouldn't worry about used Ruger anyway, since their revolvers are built tough and CS is excellent- unless they have no part for your gun.

I would get one of each which is what I have: KGP100 w/ 4" barrel and Super Redhawk w/ 7..5" barrel.
Meditator is offline  
Old November 25, 2012, 07:11 AM   #9
Redhawk5.5+P+
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2012
Location: NV
Posts: 743


No "thank you" from the OP.
Redhawk5.5+P+ is offline  
Old November 25, 2012, 07:18 AM   #10
RobertInIowa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 4, 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 149
Redhawk all the way!
__________________
Guns don't kill people, fathers with pretty daughters do.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three comes pretty close.
Proud NRA member
RobertInIowa is offline  
Old November 25, 2012, 08:56 AM   #11
ShotPlacement
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2012
Posts: 12
Grizzly?
Your choice is clear. 44 Mag or 454 Casull

44 Mag is cheaper to shoot and will do the job.

454 Casull produces approx. 50% more energy than a 44 Mag but you'd better hang on to it when you pull that trigger!

I like Rugers and have - or have had - GP100s and SRHs. Also had a 454 Taurus Raging Bull, it was a nice gun no doubt about it - with .002 clearance between the cylinder and the forcing cone -sweet! IMHO the Taurus shot better than the SRH because of the extra weight of the gun and the barrel underlug. Not to mention the ported barrel on the RB. But the Ruger offered and extra shot.

Personally I'm torn between the two if I ever decided to play with 454s again.

One more thing. The 454 is loud - VERY LOUD!

Last edited by ShotPlacement; November 25, 2012 at 09:02 AM.
ShotPlacement is offline  
Old November 25, 2012, 10:32 AM   #12
EdInk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2009
Posts: 3,968
Since grizzlies are a potential issue, I would opt for the .44 magnum Redhawk. I find the 5.5" barrel model the most comfortable and versatile. Buffalo Bore makes a hard cast round that will put serious hurt on anything in the lower 48 states.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis
EdInk is offline  
Old November 25, 2012, 12:05 PM   #13
coolbreezy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2010
Posts: 200
got this baby for $400 used otd, id stick with the redhawk. i own both guns youre looking for
__________________
Kimber custom stainless II, Ruger GP100 6" barrel .357 magnum, Sig p226 ST .40, Taurus Raging Bull .454 casull 6.5", Remington 870 tactical magnum, Taurus pt22, S&W 629-1 3" .44 mag, Ruger Redhawk .44mag 7.5", Beretta M9;
coolbreezy is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10417 seconds with 9 queries