![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 16, 2009
Location: Wheeling, WV
Posts: 45
|
Palmetto State VS Windham Weaponry
Torn between the 2 for my first AR. Both are in the $700-$800 range and both have a reputation for being the best "low cost" AR. Which do I give the green light? I want to eventually put a 4 rail forearm on it.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 1,477
|
PSA is the easy choice here.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2012
Location: Northeast, Fl
Posts: 191
|
Windham Weaponry is the easy choice here.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2005
Posts: 568
|
Windham Weaponry!
Just bought a Windham Weaponry special edition SRC from Cabelas. It has a laser etched American flag on it and best of all $10 from each sale goes to wounded veterans. Compared it several different manufacturers and it was the best in the price range. WW workers have a total of Decades of firearms manufacturing and make an excellent product.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2011
Posts: 260
|
Does Windham (formerly Bushmaster) use parts / testing that are at least up to milspec standards?
PSA does. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,491
|
I looked at the specs and decided the PSA was the better gun. But I don't think you would go wrong with either. I have 1 complete PSA rifle with a PSA upper on a Rock River lower. The FN made 1:7 barrel was the deciding factor for me.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 16, 2009
Location: Wheeling, WV
Posts: 45
|
Yes! Yes! Yes! This is the exact back-and-forth I wanted to see!! Keep it comin boys (and girls, maybe)!!
Thanks to all! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
Not that Windham makes a bad product. It's just that PSA offers a better product for the same (or less) money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 2,960
|
Very Good Windham Review Link
The best WW review I've seen yet above by Sturm. My experience with three of their rifles mirrors his; I just haven't gotten around to shooting a review yet... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,864
|
I think the new Windham is a good product, reviews I have read are all very positive. BUT, the PSA well have a CMV 1-7 FN barrel and a HPT, MPI, C158 bolt and 8620 heat treated carrier. In other words a mil-spec barrel and BCG and that is the heart of the rifle, the rest is window dressing.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2012
Location: Northeast, Fl
Posts: 191
|
http://http://windhamweaponry.com/pdf/UpdatedTechSheets/MPCMSRPPRICING.pdf
Windham Weaponry also has a transferable lifetime warranty against defects. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 10, 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,188
|
PSA just because they have FN barrels
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 297
|
Mil-spec doesnt guaranty an accurate reliable firearm. Just sayin.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2010
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,038
|
Palmetto all day erry day. For reasons already stated.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,864
|
Quote:
Commercial grade vs mil-spec, at the same cost, I would always go with mil-spec. That does not mean we need to have mil-spec parts for a reliable rifle. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 1,597
|
Windham Weaponry is the old Bushmaster company reopened as Windham Weaponry when Remington voided their deal by moving production to Ilion, NY.
Windham Weaponry is an excellent reliable and accurate rifle that comes with a transferable life time warranty. My choice would definitely be the WIndham hands down without a doubt. What is the big thing about mil-spec ? Is your Remington semi auto mil-spec? Is your Winchester or and other brand of semi auto rifles mil-spec ? |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
That said, there are benefits to the "mil-spec" components used by PSA, as compared to the Windham rifles, such as the M16 BCG (which in theory slows down the action and reduces wear & tear), the mil-spec buffer tube (which allows a wider range of aftermarket stocks) HP & MPI testing (which adds a little peace of mind), 1:7 barrel twist (which allows better accuracy when firing heavier bullets), as well as things like hammer-forging of the barrel (which allows for tougher steel). |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2010
Posts: 1,674
|
Sure there are benefits to PSA's milspec parts. They arent the only ones with quality parts and you probably wont have to wait for 3--6 months to get your ''milspec'' stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 222
|
I did quite a bit of research and settled on the PSA. So far this rifle that cost me about $550 total has performed flawlessly. It is very accurate and has about 2K rounds through it with no failures at all.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,864
|
Quote:
Yes, they are. My Garands, Carbines and half my M1A's are mil-spec, it's the way they come. ![]() A mil-spec part is made in a specific manor with specific materials. In the world of AR's mil-spec components are generally of superior material and construction. IMHO what is important for the AR owner/buyer, is to know what the differences are between the two. Just because these mil-spec parts are available for the AR does not mean you need them in order to have a reliable AR. There are more commercial grade AR's around than mil-spec AR's. For most shooters it makes little difference if the rifle is mil-spec or commercial grade as long as it goes bang when they pull the trigger. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
Here's my true mil-spec Springfield Armory M1 Garand from the CMP. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 1,597
|
I was talking about Remington, Winchester, Browning etc regular semi auto hunting rifles. Not militry garands and military carbine's. Civilian rifles are not mil-spec and they work fine and last for years.
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
Quote:
All that said, if I had the option of a relatively low-cost AR that used mostly commerical parts, and one that used mostly mil-spec parts (and cost the same money or less), I'd pick the mostly mil-spec AR all day long. This is especially true when I walk into Wal-Mart and see a Windham priced at $999 and a Colt priced at $1059. For $50, it's a no-brainer. Of course, there is a point when the pendulum tips in the other direction. There are high-priced rifles from Noveske and KAC that don't use all mil-spec parts - they use BETTER than mil-spec. |
||
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,864
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: October 2, 2012
Posts: 57
|
Psa is the way to go great customer service fast shipping and good prices especially when they have sales
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|