The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

View Poll Results: New or Used model 27
New 6 19.35%
Used 25 80.65%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 11, 2012, 11:25 AM   #1
RamItOne
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 976
Model 27- new or used

The only revolver I have is my dads colt 38 det spcl. I don't shoot it but once a year (sentimental).

I am not wanting to start buying several revolvers, just want one darn good one. I've narrowed it down to the 27 (would like .44 mag but don't want to pay the ammo costs).
Now on to the question, how do the new production runs from S&W compare to a used one, sure there's different degrees of quality/condition in a used gun but let's just say the used gun was in very good mechanical condition.
What would you choose.

Thanks
RamItOne is offline  
Old October 11, 2012, 12:54 PM   #2
Zhillsauditor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2008
Posts: 635
Probably nine out of ten people on this forum is going to tell you to get a used one due to perceived quality problems with S&W. I have had two post-lock smiths (686+ and 617), and, while I ended up selling them, both were fine weapons, every bit as good mechanically as my older smiths. That being said, the cost of a new 27s are nearly as much as the old 27s (in good shape), yet the resale value on the old 27s is generally better.

Another cost concious option is getting an older model 28. The differences between a 27 and a 28 are (mostly?) cosmetic. I had a 27 but sold it for a slight profit when I realized I just enjoyed the 28 at least as much. A model 28 should cost quite a bit less than a model 27 in similar condition.

BTW, my next smith is going to be a 627 pro. Eight rounds of 357? Heck yeah!
Zhillsauditor is offline  
Old October 11, 2012, 01:12 PM   #3
feets
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 420
I say used just for the cost savings. Inspect the revolver and make sure it checks out. If not, wait for a better one.
I don't want to see another anti-lock thread get started. Those only annoy people and won't change anyone's opinions.
feets is offline  
Old October 11, 2012, 04:19 PM   #4
hardworker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 4, 2010
Posts: 820
The problem with the internet is that one guy's misfortune turns into internet lore in record time. Yes, problems have occurred with the new Smiths, just like they did with the old ones. The only difference is the old guns that had problems didn't make it to today. They were either repaired or discarded. That's why the old guns are perceived as being of better quality.

Yes, the bluing on those old guns won't be beat by anything today. Mechanically speaking though, I'd say guns made today are the best they've ever been.

Also, if the lock worries you, it can be removed. Instructions are on the internet on how to do it.
hardworker is offline  
Old October 11, 2012, 04:54 PM   #5
IDAHOMIKE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2007
Location: Gooding, ID
Posts: 348
Hard to beat the old ones, but there sure aint anything wrong with the new ones. If I were looking for one for heavy use, I may lean towards a new model, but from an enjoyment standpoint, Id go with the old.
__________________
Need some top notch gunleather? Please check out my facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/A-T...05958232763057 and my website at http://atouchofyellowleatherwerkes.weebly.com/
10% discount for TFL members. Thanks for looking!
IDAHOMIKE is offline  
Old October 12, 2012, 01:00 AM   #6
old bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Not close enough to the beach
Posts: 1,148
As nice a revolve as the new 627 may, it can't hold a candle to the M-27's.
old bear is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 07:16 AM   #7
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 768
The new guns don't hold a candle to the old ones. The new guns will function but the aren't of the same quality. As for the lock, who cares? I have three and the lock has never been a problem. Timing was off on one, extractor screwed up on one, burr in the forcing cone on the other. I have another made after they stopped pinning the bbls, it shoots ok but plates lead on the cylinder, took it for repair, still plates lead. Find an old gun that is pinned, you'll have a better chance of getting a good gun. Almost forgot, I also bought a new Model 24 in the 80's, sent it back 3 times, finally traded it off.
pete2 is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 07:48 AM   #8
silvermane_1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: Burien,WA
Posts: 386
i voted used, especially older 27.
__________________
Ruger:SR1911 CMD,MK 3 .22lr 6",Sec. Six '76 liberty .357 4",SRH .480 Ruger 7.5",Mini-14 188 5.56/.233 18.5", Marlin: 795 .22lr 16.5",30aw 30-30 20",Mossberg:Mav. 88 Tact. 12 ga, 18.5",ATR 100 .270 Win. 22",S&W:SW9VE
9mm 4",Springfeild:XD .357sig 4",CAI PSL-54C, WASR 10/63
silvermane_1 is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 08:42 AM   #9
shortwave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,930
I'm in the 'old used' crowd.
shortwave is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 08:58 AM   #10
CajunBass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: Chancellorsville, Virginia
Posts: 3,402
I've never owned a "new" Model 27, but I have owned a couple of "new" (with the lock) 44's and 45's. No, they might not be as nice as the older ones, but they were a long way from bad. I eventually sold them off to fund other purchases, but not because I was disatisified with the guns in any way.

I would say to get an older one, but only because I suspect they'd be less expensive.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16 (NKJV)
CajunBass is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 10:53 AM   #11
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,846
I'd be looking for an older one simply because the new ones aren't offered as six-shooters with 3 1/2" or 5" barrels.
__________________
Smith, and Wesson, and Me. -H. Callahan
Well waddaya know, one buwwet weft! -E. Fudd
All bad precedents begin as justifiable measures. -J. Caesar
Webleymkv is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 11:40 AM   #12
Dave T
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2000
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,140
Current production S&Ws are shadows or reflections of their former, top of the line revolvers, the Model 27 being one of the best of those.

They now call anything that remotely resembles an older model a "Classic" but they are anything but classic or even classy. The frame contours have been changed where the hammer rides and discerning fans of the older Smiths can tell the difference at a glance, i.e. the new guns which must allow for the infernal and un-necessary lock are ugly by comparison. Add to that the frame mounted firing pin that frequently needs replacing because of mis-fires and the MIM parts and you're talking about a different sort of revolver entirely.

Not trying to offend owners of the newer guys but they just aren't what a Smith & Wesson used to be. YMMV!

Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD Ret
Dave T is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 04:40 PM   #13
RamItOne
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 976
Thanks for the input, now what's with the "-2" etc that I see behind some of the models, Im guessing its a different generation. Any specific groups or runs I should avoid?
RamItOne is offline  
Reply

Tags
357 , s&w

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10641 seconds with 10 queries