The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 4, 2012, 09:47 AM   #101
Al Norris
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,447
No discussion. There are succeeding amendments that modify that term.
Al Norris is offline  
Old October 5, 2012, 02:11 AM   #102
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
13, 14, 15, and 19 all leap to mind.

For discussion, BT, those were amendments specifically added to modify the original BoR - which is how things are supposed to be done.

Courts or politicians "re-interpreting" existing amendments is not how things are supposed to be done.

Use of the prefatory clause to argue that the 2nd Amendment did not apply to individuals did not even begin until the late 19th century. People who want to argue that is how it should work ought to be lobbying to add an amendment to modify the 2nd, not trying to twist the 2nd into what it is not.
MLeake is offline  
Old October 5, 2012, 08:13 AM   #103
Horny Toad
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 191
An interesting piece that does a nice job of explaining the 2nd Amendment and how it came to be:
NRA Life Member

We Don't Need No Steenking 2nd Amendment

Horny Toad is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2016 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11883 seconds with 7 queries