The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 27, 2012, 02:01 AM   #1
Thompson1919
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1
Small magazines and their springs...

The relentless debate over magazine spring fatigue through either constant compression or cycling is not my question here. I have my own opinion and practices as I'm sure every one else here does... HOWEVER, every article, post, etc. that I've read has been referenced with either full size or officer model 1911 magazines.

The question is this: Should the same procedures followed for larger 1911 magazines be followed with "small" size single stack magazines, specifically for a Sig Sauer P238? The question is NOT which procedure is "better", (i.e. cycling mags vs. static compression), but if experience out there indicates an inherent difference in how a pocket auto magazine should be treated.
Thompson1919 is offline  
Old September 27, 2012, 02:15 AM   #2
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 7,116
I have 2 Star DKs-the pistol the SIG was copied from. They date from the late 1950s-early 1960s. Both have had their magazines fully loaded for 35 years, that I know of. Springs are fine.
__________________
Bill DeShivs
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Reply

Tags
compression , magazine , p238 sig sauer 380 , pocket gun , spring

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05784 seconds with 7 queries