The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 12, 2013, 12:33 PM   #1
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 363
Sub-compact: More popular than full-size, lately?

It appears to me that today, sub-compact semiauto pistols (G26 and thelike) are more popular than full-size or slightly compact ones. If I'm right, there was this boom in the early 2000s after legislation concerning concealed carry was coming onto effect.

Still, ten years later, seemingly monthly there are new contributions to the aleady huge line of sub-compacts. Not only that all of the major manufacturers have one in their portfolio, there also seems to be a vast number of manufacturers whichg are specialized exclusively in guns of this size and capacity (Kel-Tec, Cobra, SCCY....)

Is this a misconception of mine or is the market for sub-compacts still boasting?
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. Savage Axis XP (.223 Rem)
. G17 3rd gen. (9mm)
. Taurus PT22 PLY (.22lr)
simonrichter is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 02:47 PM   #2
breakingcontact
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 736
Re: Sub-copmact: More popular than full-size, lately?

Compacts or sub compacts are much easier to carry than a full size gun for most people.
breakingcontact is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 03:32 PM   #3
jfost
Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 41
Sub compacts have been the rage for years now. Micro-compacts are the rage lately. I read a blog once that talked about the change in concealed carry laws in the 2000's which spawned Ruger's interest in their LCP and LC9 pistols. Subs are getting eclipsed by these micro-compacts now it seems.
jfost is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 03:41 PM   #4
shuler13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: Austin
Posts: 156
Sub-copmact: More popular than full-size, lately?

I think it's more to do with the fact that the area is still evolving. I think early on it was a could we make a reliable, effective subcompact. .380s came, then similar models in the more popular 9mm and if course .45. Now we are in the stage of fine tuning a balance of acceptable small size and comfort to shoot. The expectations were low early on, now we expect a good trigger, comfortable ergonomics, and comfortable to shoot.

I also think that a lot of shooters have their favorite full size models so they aren't itching for something new and this new market presents an empty slot in their personal arsenal.
shuler13 is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 06:05 PM   #5
thedudeabides
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 990
I typically carry a 4.25" Commander, only recently did it occur to me that it's bigger than what qualifies as a "full size" gun these days.
thedudeabides is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 06:15 PM   #6
alex0535
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 781
Who wouldn't want a compact or sub-compact option for concealed carry, especially one in a larger caliber than .380?
alex0535 is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 06:46 PM   #7
shouldazagged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 17, 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 273
J-frames and SP-101's are hot sellers too. Try to find a good Smith!
__________________
"Don't let macho be your epitaph."
---Ed Lovette
shouldazagged is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 06:47 PM   #8
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 11,482
The number of concealed carry permit holders increases each day. Smaller guns are easier to carry and conceal and that is driving the market to produce sub compact guns.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 06:47 PM   #9
jpcmt
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2013
Posts: 12
Having conceal carried a G21sf, G36, G17, G19, G26, and a G27, I believe the G19 commands the most praise for it's balance. Sure it's great to go smaller and there's no less accuracy from a g26 to a g19 to a g17 if you have modest training.

But if you look at the poll in this forum, its looking like the midsize is king.

Having said that, I do believe the pocket gun craze we've had over the last 5 years is proving to be a disappointment. Sure everyone's picking up one after convincing themselves they need it smaller, lighter, and more concealable. But in my experience as a trainer and a gun forum junky all over the place, folks aren't spending time on the range with those dumb little guns because they're hard to hold onto, they offer no range fun or accuracy..it's just a necessary evil that gets put into that purse or rug or pocket holster and forgotten. And the gun that doesn't get training time ("because it hurts to shoot" says my mom and other women trying to hold onto that 9mm keltec or ruger), creates more liability than asset.
jpcmt is offline  
Old April 12, 2013, 09:45 PM   #10
arizona98tj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 973
I enjoy shooting my XD9 sub-compact more than I do my full sized XD9. For me, it shoots every bit as accurately as its big brother, if not more so. A recent acquisition of a XD-S .45ACP didn't disappoint me for a second....and that's pretty small and lightweight. It too is a pleasure to shoot. My Kahr PM9 is not uncomfortable to shoot either....on its range trips, it eats through just as much as any other handgun I take with me.

For folks that have spent money on the smaller sized handguns that aren't fun to shoot, I feel sorry for you....maybe better research might have made a difference. But I won't buy into the fact that just because a handgun is small, it has to hurt to shoot it. My experience proves otherwise.
__________________
stu-offroad.com
Largest Jeep TJ project site on the web!
(now with guns)
arizona98tj is offline  
Old April 13, 2013, 12:43 AM   #11
RBid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2012
Posts: 1,055
Subs and micros are far and away the biggest sellers in my area right now. S&W air weights, micro .380s, single stack sub 9s, and similar sized options are impossible to keep in stock. If I had 20 S&W Shields in, I could sell them at $600 each, within a week. LCP? S&W 642? Done and done. Easy money. Meanwhile, service pistols are second class citizens, relegated to HD and range roles.

Everybody is chasing 'small'.

Personally, I prefer to carry the largest and most capable choices that I can comfortably carry.
__________________
Currently Own: Beretta PX4 9mm, Glock 23 (Gen 4), Glock 19 (Gen 4) x2
RBid is offline  
Old April 13, 2013, 04:20 AM   #12
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 363
Quote:
But if you look at the poll in this forum, its looking like the midsize is king.
Any idea where one can find said poll?
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. Savage Axis XP (.223 Rem)
. G17 3rd gen. (9mm)
. Taurus PT22 PLY (.22lr)
simonrichter is offline  
Reply

Tags
cobra , concealed carry , sccy , sub-compact

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09390 seconds with 9 queries