The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 19, 2012, 10:50 AM   #1
bobbart
Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Posts: 72
Please see post Ruger Mini 14 or mini 30?

Please see post Ruger Mini 14 or mini 30?

Last edited by bobbart; September 21, 2012 at 08:52 AM. Reason: Please see post Ruger Mini 14 or mini 30?
bobbart is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 11:14 AM   #2
armed_librarian
Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2011
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 71
The mini-14 is chambered in .223. This bullet is lighter and faster than the 7.62x39. Until about 100 yards the accuracy between the two rounds is comparable. After that the .223 is the accuracy winner, hands down. The mini-30 is the gun chambered in 7.62. They look the same, the number just reflects which caliber. The 7.62 is the heavier bullet and will have better stopping power. I'm on my phone or I would try and find a link, but google a ballistics comparison chart. In particular look at how much the 7.62x39 slows down, and drops after that 100 yard mark. If you don't plan on shooting past the 100 yard mark, go with the mini-30. Ammo will be cheaper, it will have more stopping power, and will be as accurate as you want it to be. People will argue that the mini-14 is not as accurate as the .223 round. Some people say that the 200 yard mark is the max, others say more. Kinda depends on what you're looking to do with it.
armed_librarian is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 11:32 AM   #3
bobbart
Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Posts: 72
Using the 7.62x39 ammo

Using the 7.62x39 ammo, will I have less in the clip campare to the .223?

Bobbart
bobbart is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 11:59 AM   #4
allaroundhunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
sing the 7.62x39 ammo, will I have less in the clip campare to the .223?
No, they both come with 5 and 20 round magazines available.

Which round has more "stopping power"? The 7.62x39 Mini 30

Which round is heavier? The 7.62x39 Mini 30 (by an average of about 65 gr)

Which round is better for long range shooting? The .223 (but the Mini 14 itself is not a great long range shooter, they are typically a 3-4 MOA gun in my experiences with them)
allaroundhunter is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 12:29 PM   #5
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 7,843
7.62x39 generally has more stopping power and is heavier than .223.
.223 (same as 5.56) is better for long range accuracy.
Regardless of rifle, you can squeeze more .223 into a magazine than 7.62

FWIW, I really like the Mini-14. I have the full-auto version and can attest to the fact that its a gun that will last more than a lifetime.
Skans is online now  
Old September 19, 2012, 12:46 PM   #6
allaroundhunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Regardless of rifle, you can squeeze more .223 into a magazine than 7.62
Both the Mini 14 and Mini 30 have 5 and 20 round magazines available from the factory. They don't use the same magazines so saying that you will fit more 5.56 into the mag than 7.62 is false.

If you are trying to use the same magazine for each, then yes, using 5.56 will yield a higher capacity.
allaroundhunter is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 12:50 PM   #7
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 7,843
Duplicate - deleted

Last edited by Skans; September 19, 2012 at 04:10 PM.
Skans is online now  
Old September 19, 2012, 12:51 PM   #8
gak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2005
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 2,767
You didn't specifically ask about hunting, but if that's on your (or other readers') mind re "stopping power"...One (the 30) is potentially a viable short range (<150 yds) "deer" round--sort of a rimless .30-30--the other is not IMHO. Yes, many deer have been taken with the .223 - as they have .30 carbine and even, old days/or illegally .22 LR), etc., doesn't mean "should." The .223/14 is the choice of many a weekend warrior hunter, and I've seen all too many wounded anumals, or the mess it can do on ther ones killed. In some states, the .223 is illegal for deer.

I wouldn't actually purchase the x39 (in any platform) as my "dedicated" deer rifle (the .30-30 still trumps for the shorter ranges, and of course at longer ranges the .243, 7mm-08, .308, .270 etc, better yet. But, if all I had was a x39, and I kept my distances "reasonable," I'd not shy away from using it. From that perspective, the x39 trumps the .223 as a game-getter in terms of "ultimate" flexibility to take the larger animals more reliably...Though some will argue, probably correctly, as a "survival" weapon, the combination of more rounds (on one's person/pack) and smaller/lighter bullet of the .223 as a better for the more typical survival quarry - small game -- might be the better choice (if not in bear country!).
gak is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 02:24 PM   #9
bobbart
Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Posts: 72
it's more for home protection and target shoting

Thr Ruger will be for home protection and target shooting, no hunting.
That's why I was asking about the caliber 7.62x39 versus the .223.

Which is better for protection and target shootinG.

Thank you for your replies,

bobbart
bobbart is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 03:27 PM   #10
allaroundhunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
I prefer the .223 for defense and target shooting. It is cheap (as is the x39), but the .223 will over-penetrate less than the 7.62x39 while still packing a wallop.
allaroundhunter is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 07:39 PM   #11
stu925
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 945
I've got a 581 series Mini-14 that I love, it's a handy little carbine. Mine shoots pretty well averaging in the neighborhood of 1.5-2 MOA. For me I was looking specifically for a .223 Rem and the Mini-30 was never really considered. If you're considering a Mini-30 you may want to consider using only Brass cased boxer primed ammo in it which will bump up your ammo costs, this alone would sway me to the .223.

Stu
stu925 is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 08:11 PM   #12
militant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 473
I have had 3 of these in .223. If you want accuracy, get a cheaper AR. Dmps or something along that. They both retail close to the same. If you want stopping power...in what I'm assuming is hunting, the 7.62 punches a bigger hole with ballistics close to a 30-30. Sure, you could kill a deer with a .223, but I wouldn't. If you are fond of the mini 14 action, go to CMP and buy a M1 garand. Then you get semi auto, accuracy and knock down power
__________________
A hit with a .22 is better than a miss with a .44
militant is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 11:30 PM   #13
Quentin2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 18, 2009
Location: NorthWest USA
Posts: 1,637
If you're comparing 7.62x39 vs. 5.56/.223 you really should be thinking the AK and AR along with the Minis.
Quentin2 is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 11:40 PM   #14
the rifleer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2008
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,255
Honestly, I thin 7.62x39 is the answer to all of those, but either will serve you well. I really like my mini 14.
__________________
There is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people.
the rifleer is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 12:27 AM   #15
allaroundhunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Honestly, I thin 7.62x39 is the answer to all of those
7.62x39....for long(er) range shooting being better than a .223?
allaroundhunter is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 07:46 AM   #16
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 7,843
.223 is hands down better in a mini-14 for long range accuracy. You will find that all of the Mini-14 accurizing services and products are for the .223, not 7.62x39.
Skans is online now  
Old September 20, 2012, 08:38 AM   #17
Strafer Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,126
All I see in the used rack are 186 or 188 series not well thought of by the internet. The only people claiming decent accuracy seem to be 586 owners.
WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET 1.5 MINUTE ACCURACY ALREADY!
Strafer Gott is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 08:47 AM   #18
hardhat harry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 27, 2010
Location: I've moved...
Posts: 233
Just my two cents worth:

http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=497422
__________________
"Let me live in my house by the side of the road and be a friend to man."
hardhat harry is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 09:00 AM   #19
2damnold4this
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 1,324
I had an older mini that wasn't particularly accurate but it was completely reliable. I tried different ammo but could never get more than 4 or 5 MOA. 4 to 5 MOA plus complete reliability is fine for defense in the home but I wanted more accuracy so I traded the rifle.

I wouldn't hesitate to rely on that light weight older mini for home defense but I've got other toys that are just as good for home defense and better for other applications.
2damnold4this is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 11:44 AM   #20
Strafer Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,126
So the answer is shun all the models that start with a 1, and seek a model that starts with a 5. That pretty much means a new one. I even saw a mini chambered for a .222, and I almost gave it a try, but my previous experience was too similar to Too Damn old fer this s... "s.
Strafer Gott is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 12:12 PM   #21
mr.t7024
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2012
Location: Ma, near a brook
Posts: 229
mini 14

My wife bought me one this past Christmas,It is awesome.You can shoot the .223 and the 5.65 out of it.If you buy new,Ruger does not want you to shoot Russian ammo out of it as it will void the Warranty.I called and that is the answer I got. I use Federal ammo and I have been quite pleased so far.BTW mine has the wood stock! Cliff
mr.t7024 is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 03:29 PM   #22
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 7,843
Quote:
WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET 1.5 MINUTE ACCURACY ALREADY!
Guaranteed sub 1.5 MOA in a Mini-14 will cost you $729. Maybe you can get it done cheaper, but you can check out the prices for this service here: http://www.ruger-mini-14-firearms.co...ini_prices.php
Skans is online now  
Old September 20, 2012, 05:29 PM   #23
hardhat harry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 27, 2010
Location: I've moved...
Posts: 233
I have sub-MOA in my Mini-14. To achieve that I had to get the following:

1. Breath control
2. Trigger squeeze
3. Follow through

I am in the process of sending my trigger group to get it reduced to 3.5 pound pull.

http://www.accuracysystemsinc.com/index.php
__________________
"Let me live in my house by the side of the road and be a friend to man."
hardhat harry is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 05:30 PM   #24
hardhat harry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 27, 2010
Location: I've moved...
Posts: 233
skans, i didn't follow your link before posting mine....same place! Sorry.
__________________
"Let me live in my house by the side of the road and be a friend to man."
hardhat harry is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 05:38 PM   #25
redhawk45
Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2012
Posts: 75
I recently bought a 5801 Mini 14 and it is great. Good accuracy too with 100 percent reliability so far. Mini 14 is better for home defense if excess penetration of walls to exit a house is a concern.
redhawk45 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12228 seconds with 9 queries