The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 4, 2012, 07:14 PM   #1
ernierod
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2008
Location: Clinton,Tennessee
Posts: 11
AR-10 260 Remington

Have a AR-10 Armalite-22" bbl-SS Bull bbl config.-1:8" twist.Am starting to develope accuracy loads for rifle using 139-142 gr bullets.I have the following powders-4064,4350,4831,RL19 and N150. Can anyone suggest a powder that I may try first to test for accuracy.Thanks for help.

Last edited by ernierod; September 5, 2012 at 07:55 AM.
ernierod is offline  
Old September 4, 2012, 07:24 PM   #2
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 1,241
I would be interested in how well your rifle works. Has it been reliable? How often does it jam? (if ever?)
Wyosmith is offline  
Old September 4, 2012, 08:03 PM   #3
hodaka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,840
My 700 in 260 likes both 4064 and 4350 although I tend to use 4350 more. I think you can work up loads for each.

I'd like to hear how you like the rifle. I've got an eye on the Armalite and DPMS in .260 and will get one when the wife isn't paying attention.

BTW- my 9 twist doesn't like 140's but shoots the 120's quite well.
hodaka is offline  
Old September 4, 2012, 11:47 PM   #4
bullspotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 304
I run the H4350 in my 260. AAA++ results with the 123 and 140 amax in a 1-8 twist.
bullspotter is offline  
Old September 5, 2012, 06:25 AM   #5
LSnSC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2010
Posts: 514
Of the powders you've listed only IMR 4064 is recommended for gas operated rifles.
RL 19 amd IMR 4831 worked best im my 260 bolt gun with all bullet weights, but they are too slow to be optimal in gas guns.
LSnSC is offline  
Old September 5, 2012, 08:19 AM   #6
hodaka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,840
Why do you think 4350 is not suitable for an AR?

Understood about M1.
hodaka is offline  
Old September 5, 2012, 05:26 PM   #7
TimW77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2008
Posts: 232
"Of the powders you've listed only IMR 4064 is recommended for gas operated rifles.
RL 19 amd IMR 4831 worked best im my 260 bolt gun with all bullet weights, but they are too slow to be optimal in gas guns."

Since when have AR-15 and AR-10 "type" rifles had the same operating limitations as the M-1/M-1A/M-14?

You can't bend the op rod on an AR...

T.
TimW77 is offline  
Old September 7, 2012, 05:09 PM   #8
LSnSC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2010
Posts: 514
Slow powders and they longer power curve can cause excessive port pressure resulting in battering of the BCG and broken components. An AR-10's BCG is heavy, get that weight moving faster than it was designed to move and something is gonna give.

Why would you think if it will bend an op rod, it wont beat the hell out of your BCG????
LSnSC is offline  
Old September 7, 2012, 06:54 PM   #9
mnhntr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 9, 2008
Posts: 972
I use H4350 in my bolt .260, I would think Varget would be a good choice in a gas gun.
mnhntr is offline  
Old September 7, 2012, 07:13 PM   #10
hodaka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,840
I wouldn't think the comparison between the two operating systems is valid. I ran 4350 through my DPMS 308 for years and never saw any sign of wear. I think that you are wrong. I've also run a 6.8 with an 5.56 carbine gas system and carbine buffer for years without issues. The BCG design is pretty robust.
hodaka is offline  
Old September 7, 2012, 08:29 PM   #11
LSnSC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2010
Posts: 514
I run a 6.8 as well. The recoil impulse and reciprocating mass of the BCG is a fraction of the larger platforms. It was designed to operate in a carbine length system. Apple and oranges.

Think what you like, broken parts due to improper powder selection are a reality. Just because yours hasnt failed , doesnt mean it cant. May never fail, but why risk it?

RL 15, IMR 4895, H4895, IMR 4064, Varget all are fantastic 308 powders and have burn rates ideal for gas guns. One of those will give satisfactory results in a gas operated .260. Will it be as good as one of the slower powders suitable for bolt guns? Probably not.
LSnSC is offline  
Old September 7, 2012, 11:12 PM   #12
TimW77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2008
Posts: 232
Why would you think if it will bend an op rod, it wont beat the hell out of your BCG?

Because I don't rely on internet BS for my answers!

I went to the manufacturer of my rifles and was told the powder limitations of the Garand type gas systems does NOT exist for AR type rifles.

So who do I believe? A self proclaimed expert or a REAL EXPERT in the engineering department of a major AR manufacturer?

Take your pick.

T.

Last edited by TimW77; September 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM. Reason: correct spelling
TimW77 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08665 seconds with 9 queries