The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 8, 2012, 04:38 PM   #1
StaTiK
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 17
Weird Marlin action issue?

Hello,

I've been looking at Marlin 336s for a while now and may have found a used one I like but there is something that doesn't look right to me. The picture below shows what I'm referring to. I'm not a gunsmith, but to me it looks like a piece of sheet metal is peeling back inside the action.

Unfortunately this would not be a FTF transfer so I wouldn't get to physically inspect before purchase. Is this normal?



-StaTiK-
StaTiK is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 04:56 PM   #2
rocky.223
Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2011
Location: St. Louis Area
Posts: 69
I am no expert sta Tik but I do own a 1982 model 336 and the action interior (including chamber throat) are all solid and blued like the exterior. There is no type of wear and tear as seen in your photograph. Mine is newer to me but has a life time of hunting behind it. Being that you can't inspect before purchase I would be very hesitant to purchase this one. I absolutely love my little marlin though and wish you the best of luck with any you purchase.
__________________
rocky
rocky.223 is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 05:05 PM   #3
tango1niner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: rural upstate NY
Posts: 125
I have never seen anything like that in a Model 336 action. That is downright ugly and I would advise to keep looking.
tango1niner is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 05:23 PM   #4
Goatwhiskers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2009
Location: Batchelor, La.
Posts: 478
Looks an awful lot like Bubba tried some kind of repair. GW
Goatwhiskers is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 05:28 PM   #5
Woody55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
You'd think if that piece wasn't supposed to be there, you'd have trouble getting the bolt to move past that point.

Strictly guessing here (I don't know how to follow the thread without posting something) but could it be built that way as something to keep the cartridge from coming off the lifting tray?

I'm looking forward to hearing from someone who knows what the photo shows.
Woody55 is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 05:49 PM   #6
PawPaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,115
I've looked inside a lot of Marlin actions, and I've never seen anything like that. Wondering if it might be a piece of trash? Something metallic that shouldn't be there? Either way, it's odd.
__________________
Dennis Dezendorf

http://pawpawshouse.blogspot.com
PawPaw is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 06:19 PM   #7
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: 1B ID
Posts: 6,929
That looks like a Bubba "feed mod" to me. And, being a .30-30, there shouldn't have been the need for such a thing, in the first place.
Plus... it looks like it has been brazed or welded in place.

I wouldn't touch that thing, unless I was using it as a target.
__________________
"Such is the strange way that man works -- first he virtually destroys a species and then does everything in his power to restore it."
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 07:04 PM   #8
PetahW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,679
Pass.................

.
PetahW is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 08:26 PM   #9
StaTiK
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 17
Thank you all for your responses. I've never had a lever action but I've owned/used a lot of firearms and have never seen anything like this so I had to ask.

I can't imagine what it would be, which is why I should probably stay away.

-StaTiK-
StaTiK is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 06:17 AM   #10
Big Shrek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 548
Um, for an OLDER Marlin 336, that looks to be slightly burred/marred, but it is normal for that particular year.
It does look like someone had a bad feed jam or two to get it bent/marred like that...
but that half-moon shaped doohicky is part of the receiver...

I've got a 1952 Marlin 336, and the guts look the same, except mine is in much better condition.

A few minutes with a honing stone should get it where it needs to be

Or, as bad as the pic is, could just be some dust on top of the marring...
but it looks to be a cosmetic issue...just needs a little love...and a lower price


OH SQUISH!! Just noticed something else...(1949) is supposed to be a Waffle-Top 336, which means some BUBBA did a D/T job to mount the scope!!
That drops its collector value Considerably...I notice none of the pics show the top of the receiver...(checked stevec22's auctions)
It would make a good shooter, but definitely not a collector piece...as soon as they drilled it, they killed that end of it.
__________________
Marlin Specialist
Calico Specialist
A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool.

Last edited by Big Shrek; August 9, 2012 at 06:42 AM.
Big Shrek is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 09:34 AM   #11
Salmoneye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,387
It's not part of the receiver, it is part of the barrel...

Part 39 in this illustration:



If the action closes and locks up so;id, it is fine...I believe it is more a trick of light than boogered...

EDITED...

Cuz I can't sepll, and I had the part noomber rong...

Last edited by Salmoneye; August 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM.
Salmoneye is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 12:20 PM   #12
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,507
Called a barrel hood, and yes, it is part of the barrel and entirely normal.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 05:08 PM   #13
badlander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: So. Fla
Posts: 327
I had to go look at one. My 1957 336 SC. I had never noticed it before. Mine is all blued with no wear marks at all on it, after 52 years of use. it don'tlook like that!
__________________
We have room for all of Alaska's wildlife. Right next to the mashed potatos- Sarah Palin
badlander is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 09:49 PM   #14
StaTiK
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 17
Could one of you fine gentlemen with a "proper" looking action/barrel please post a picture? I see what you are referring to in the schematic but what I see in the photo doesn't look the same.

-StatiK-
StaTiK is offline  
Old August 10, 2012, 05:52 AM   #15
Salmoneye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,387
Quote:
Could one of you fine gentlemen with a "proper" looking action/barrel please post a picture? I see what you are referring to in the schematic but what I see in the photo doesn't look the same.
The picture is terrible...Plain and simple...

Ask for a better pic, as I don't see any 'sheet metal peeling', and am now not sure where you are looking...
Salmoneye is offline  
Old August 10, 2012, 08:47 AM   #16
Woody55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
I've been wondering if the OP and the barrel hood folks are looking at the same thing on the photo.

Is the barrel hood the extension(s) of the barrel at the breech end? The two c shaped projections that almost surround the breach?

I thought the OP was pointing to something that looks like its connected to the upper left portion of the inside of the receiver. Kind of long and coming off the receiver at an angle.

Both are shown in the photo, but the breach was the first thing I noticed.
Woody55 is offline  
Old August 10, 2012, 01:40 PM   #17
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,808
Quote:
Is the barrel hood the extension(s) of the barrel at the breech end? The two c shaped projections that almost surround the breach?

Two C shaped projections????? All I see is the hood but it does look a little funny. Could be the lighting I guess.
Hawg is offline  
Old August 10, 2012, 01:57 PM   #18
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,507
Quote:
Is the barrel hood the extension(s) of the barrel at the breech end? The two c shaped projections that almost surround the breach?
Yes, the barrel hood is part of the barrel that projects to the rear and assists in feeding and aligning the bolt when the rifle is in battery. There are no C-shaped pieces, the circular piece is the rear end of the barrel and there is a notch cut in it. The notch, on the ejection port side of the rear of the barrel, is the extractor notch.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old August 10, 2012, 09:41 PM   #19
Woody55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
I think they would appear C shaped if viewed from the rear of the barrel. But I understand what they are and see them in the photo.

I don't think that is what the OP is referring to in the photo. Look farther to the rear in the receiver. It looks like something has been partially peeled off the inside of the receiver and is hanging there.
Woody55 is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 12:22 AM   #20
StaTiK
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 17
Quote:
Ask for a better pic, as I don't see any 'sheet metal peeling', and am now not sure where you are looking...
I apologize for any confusion. The piece I am referring to is circled in yellow. I do see item #39 in the schematic but wouldn't have assumed that the "extreme" angle/bend was normal or that it was necessarily the same part as #39.



I also see what Woody55 is referring to (marked in purple) but I wasn't particularly concerned about that portion, assuming it to be a poor camera angle that could be cleared up with more photos.

As for getting a better picture, I asked and rather than receive additional pictures I was simply told that the area in question looks "slightly different" than another Marlin he had on hand but that it wasn't a defect. I took the lack of interest in providing additional photos as a cue that something wasn't right and lost interest in the transaction.

I am, however, interested in figuring out what this is because I'm still in the market for a Marlin lever action rifle. If it is the "barrel hood", does it serve the same function as a "feed ramp"?
-StaTiK-
StaTiK is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 02:21 AM   #21
micksis86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2009
Posts: 420
I just checked my 336 and it doesn't look like that the piece is there but the one in the picture looks like it's been bent down. I'm no expert just comparing the two.

If i had a camera with me i'd take a picture sorry.
__________________
Never argue with morons, they will lower you down to their level and beat you with experience.
micksis86 is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 05:45 AM   #22
Salmoneye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,387
To me it does not look 'bent'...It simply looks like an out of focus picture with flash shining off the high spots and dust bunnies...

If the seller will not provide a better pic, then tell him to pound sand...
Salmoneye is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 09:37 AM   #23
Ozzieman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 5,009
One other thing that bothers me about the photo, I do agree that it could be the lens doing the effect but I don’t like the lower lip of the ejection port. It does look slightly bowed outward.
I agree that it could be the lens but I also think that other arias of the gun in the photo should show the same curve. The upper edge is nice and straight all the way to the left of the photo. But the lower bows out THEN back in. And also notice that the loading port is much straighter.
To me it’s a parts gun at best.
Ozzieman is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 03:49 PM   #24
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,808
That's just camera angle. The lens is closer to the bottom of the port than it is the top making the bottom look bowed.
Hawg is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 04:32 PM   #25
StaTiK
Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 17
Quote:
One other thing that bothers me about the photo, I do agree that it could be the lens doing the effect but I don’t like the lower lip of the ejection port. It does look slightly bowed outward.
I agree that it could be the lens but I also think that other arias of the gun in the photo should show the same curve. The upper edge is nice and straight all the way to the left of the photo. But the lower bows out THEN back in. And also notice that the loading port is much straighter.
I'm no expert either but it doesn't look bowed to me, and I'm not convinced it's a camera angle either. To me, it looks like the ejection port is just oddly shaped (from the factory or otherwise).

-StaTiK-
StaTiK is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12535 seconds with 7 queries