The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

View Poll Results: SCAR or FS2000?
SCAR 36 80.00%
FS2000 9 20.00%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 5, 2012, 12:02 AM   #1
Gunnut17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 394
FN Scar 16s vs FS2000

Which rifle would be more worth the large sum of money? The Scar can use a more AR accessories, such as magazines,(Some AR mags won't fit into the FS2000's mag well.) foregrips,(the FS2000 typically has a rail-free forend.) and, with modification, grips. The FS2000 is compact, is a little more ambidextrous, and should have better balance.

So what do think?
__________________
________(====()_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-,
I_iiiii__/'''''''''[{]''''''''{_)_)_)_)_)_}========

"|Pistol calibers| all suck, so pick the one you shoot best."
Gunnut17 is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 01:02 AM   #2
SHNOMIDO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 423
Have you shot the FS2000? I've heard its a pain in the butt.
SHNOMIDO is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 01:20 AM   #3
Gunnut17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 394
Nah, I wish, it's a cool looking rifle.
__________________
________(====()_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-,
I_iiiii__/'''''''''[{]''''''''{_)_)_)_)_)_}========

"|Pistol calibers| all suck, so pick the one you shoot best."
Gunnut17 is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 01:35 AM   #4
jason41987
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 479
SCAR will be a much better rifle.. bullpups always have problems, theyre easy to learn, difficult to master... only bullpup i would spend money on would be the steyr AUG rifle
jason41987 is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 06:53 AM   #5
oneshot onekill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 24, 2010
Posts: 166
I actually didn't vote because I've owned both and was unimpressed. The "Tacticool" factor for both had outweighed my better judgement. Once the dust settled from my frenzied "gotta have one" craziness I realized I had spent a lot of money on something that only really does the same thing as an AR for twice the price. They're both cool... No doubt. But for me, that's not enough incentive to spend the extra coin... YMMV.
oneshot onekill is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 07:29 AM   #6
plouffedaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,224
Quote:
Have you shot the FS2000?
This is the first thing I thought too... I have shot it---it has a horrid trigger. That said, I wouldn't get a SCAR 16 either but it does feel like a higher quality rifle when you fire it. Now a SCAR 17--yeah, I'd be all over that
__________________
Mrgunsngear's Youtube Channel
Certified Glock Armorer
plouffedaddy is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 09:32 AM   #7
David the Gnome
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,092
Mmmmm Scar 17... That's where it's at right there.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
David the Gnome is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 09:33 AM   #8
RT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,191
Scar. No question
RT is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 10:07 AM   #9
jason41987
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 479
i agree with oneshot onekill and plouffe daddy, though with the choices given, id go SCAR... if i had any choice id pass up on either one... SCAR doesnt offer anything you cant get in an AR15 with aftermarket modifications (you can get a short-stroke piston, reciprocating side charging handle, and quick change barrel in the AR15)... so if i had any choice it would be that, or a rifle ive been coming to really like, the sig 556
jason41987 is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 10:22 AM   #10
Uncle Malice
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,592
Scar for sure. My friend has an FS2000. Such a piece of junk. Jams frequently and nearly impossible to clear them with the tiny hole.

I like piston guns, but I'm not real big on piston AR's... I guess it's just something about preferring to use a gun under it's intended design parameters. With that said, the Scar would be an excellent piston gun. From everything I've seen, it seems to have a better track record for reliability too.

I'm happy with a good higher end AR... DD or BCM.
__________________
Glock 17 G4 FDE | S&W M&P 22 | Sig P226 MK25 | Sig P229 Extreme | HK P30 | HK45 | HK USP 9 | USP Compact 9 | USP 45 TACTICAL | XDM 45 Compact | XDM 9
Daniel Defense DDM4 V4 | Arsenal SGL 21 | ASA SBR | Savage Mark II FV-SR | Mossberg 590A1 20" SP | Mossberg 500 Cruiser
My Instagram (mostly gun pics)
Uncle Malice is online now  
Old August 5, 2012, 11:13 AM   #11
FrosSsT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 583
I would go with the SCAR - but NOT the 16. For the price there are way to many options out there in 5.56. Grab yourself the 17 and call it a day. The recoil is almost that of the 5.56 (a little more but not at all bad for a 7.62/.308) I have never had any problems with it, and if you do some research and read you will learn it is quickly becoming dubbed as one of the best battle rifles out there today.
FrosSsT is offline  
Old August 5, 2012, 11:18 AM   #12
Creeper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2008
Location: Woooooshington
Posts: 1,797
I'll take poll option #3.

Cheers,
C
__________________
Shoulder Drive Nicholson Club
Creeper is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 07:13 PM   #13
cookie5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2011
Posts: 199
I would just get a high quality AR15 and call it a day.
cookie5 is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 10:05 PM   #14
Gunnut17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 394
Why are all my polls slaughters for one side?
__________________
________(====()_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-,
I_iiiii__/'''''''''[{]''''''''{_)_)_)_)_)_}========

"|Pistol calibers| all suck, so pick the one you shoot best."
Gunnut17 is offline  
Old September 16, 2012, 08:47 PM   #15
Blindmike
Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2012
Location: Albertville, Alabama
Posts: 30
Both are fine weapons but that is not the question

When it come to the Scar or the FS2000 there is one thing for sure. You get what you pay for and more. The price on both of the weapons is high as a kite and this limits the number of people who can enjoy these fine weapons. I own a FS2000 and would not trade it for any other bullpup made. It is true the trigger is like squeezing a sponge that is something you can learn to live with and after a while you don't think anything of that point. The FS2000 is as well balanced as reported and can be held and shot with one hand and hit what you aim at also. The cases coming out the front is very handy if standing close to others will the gun is fired. And I can not say enough about how hand this rifle is when in a tight place and yet still have a 17" barrel that lets you reach out and touch the longer range targets. I could go on about this rifle but I think the fine points have been well covered.
The Scar is another fine weapon but for me it doesn't bring anything to the table that you can't have in an AR-15 platform of your choice. Please do not think I am knocking the Scar down it is a fine weapon but we are discussing price and really spending the money on one or the other. That being the case IMHO I will and did pick the FS2000. Not to say anything of you can by the FS2000 for so much less than the SCAR that you will be able to put some of the goodies you will want on the rifle and still not spend as much as would be spent on the SCAR.

Last edited by Blindmike; September 16, 2012 at 08:50 PM. Reason: correction
Blindmike is offline  
Old September 16, 2012, 09:04 PM   #16
10mmAuto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2010
Posts: 598
I'd get the Scar - in .308.
10mmAuto is offline  
Old September 17, 2012, 07:10 PM   #17
HKFan9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Posts: 2,714
Not a fan of either but I would give the nod to the SCAR. However neither does anything your standard AR won't do for 1/3 the price... but I ordered an ACR from work (I get a discount) just to have something different for a rainy day, so I can't judge too much.
HKFan9 is offline  
Old September 17, 2012, 07:49 PM   #18
Palmetto-Pride
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,889
If I was going to drop that kind of coin I would get a H&K MR556A1, but thats just me. Sorry I cant help you on your poll, but I have held a SCAR 16 in my hand and was not impressed at all with it.
__________________
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”

-Margaret Thatcher-
Palmetto-Pride is offline  
Old September 17, 2012, 09:48 PM   #19
dorc-1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2012
Posts: 106
Just be patient and wait for the Beretta 160 arx.
dorc-1 is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 08:51 AM   #20
BoomieMCT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2010
Posts: 212
Haven't shot a SCAR so I can't speak to that. However I do own a FS2000. I got it in a (very favorable) trade with the idea I could sell or trade up for more. After shooting it I don't think I will be getting rid of it.

I've put thousands of rounds though it with only 3 jams. They were all early on before I found what brand mags it did and did not like. Since I figured that out I've had zero issues. Yes, you cannot use Pmags.

I find the controls to be exactly where I want them. My only complaint is the lack of a last shot bolt hold open. Mag changes are slower than an AR (no drop free) but, with a bit of practice, comparable or faster than any other rifle (certainly faster, for me, than an AK or HK91 platform).

In stock form it does not have a ton of rails. I don't really care as I can fit a low power scope and a light on the rails it has. I have no need for other accessories. For those that do, there is a tri-rail foreend that is very easy to install. I personally find the factory stock to be very ergonomic and adding something like a VFG would be counter productive.

The trigger is okay, comparable to a stock military M16/M4. Other than the addition of a Neu-trigger ($25 mod which takes a lot of the "sponge" out) there isn't too much that can be done to clean it up. For a fast shooting working rifle I find it to be more than adequate and find off-hand shots to 150 yards (furthest my range goes) to not be an issue.

I think a lot of the hate for this rifle come from people who haven't put much time behind the trigger and who expect any black rifle to be just like an AR.
BoomieMCT is offline  
Old September 19, 2012, 09:32 PM   #21
HKFan9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Posts: 2,714
I don't hate it.... I just think its a fad that never caught on. Wasn't there a problem with the firing pins in them as well?
HKFan9 is offline  
Old September 20, 2012, 10:43 PM   #22
kinoons
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2008
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 386
I haven't handled a SCAR, but I had a FS2000 and traded I for a stag piston AR -- I just couldn't get used to the trigger on the FS2000, it just plain sucks. The trigger on my ps90 is okay, the fs2000 is impossible to feel -- you don't know when it's going to break. May as well just mash the trigger on the FS.

So I'll take damn near anything over a FS2000
kinoons is offline  
Old September 21, 2012, 02:23 PM   #23
BoomieMCT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2010
Posts: 212
@ HKfan9: The early ones had a firing pin issue, yes. It was a flaw in the conversion from full to semi auto.That has been long since solved. I hear FN will fix any that still have that issue gratis.
BoomieMCT is offline  
Old September 21, 2012, 03:57 PM   #24
Hutch11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2010
Posts: 9
I have both rifles. I was going to sell the FS2000, but my wife, who is petite, loves to shoot it. As with other bullpup designs, the weight of the rifle is towards the rear and it is very easy to hold. Most shooters, especially on this forum, are familiar with AR-15/ AR-10 style rifles. I personally like the SCAR in 5.56 and 7.62. Unfortunately, FN charges quite a hefty premium for their rifles and the civilian models are made in Belgium, which limits what accessories can be legally added.

Again, although I like my Scar's, I can't say they are really better than a well made Ar-15 for the additional money. However, when I go hog hunting (Scar 17 is mush lighter than the AR-10's I have used), or to the range, I usually take a Scar along.
Hutch11 is offline  
Old September 21, 2012, 04:16 PM   #25
Microgunner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,918
I own a FN FS2000 and find it easy to use.
The trigger isn't so good but goes bang every time.
It will accept all AR-15 mags if you remove the rubber mag well gasket which will also allow free fall of the mags.
The strangest thing about shooting it is the weird hollow sound you hear when your cheek is pressed to the butt stock.
I mean, really, the entire fire control mechanism slides out the rear in one piece, without tools.
How cool is that?
Bystanders like to watch it firing just to see the empties spitting out the front.
But for serious duty I'd take my M4 over my FS2000 every time.
__________________
Proud NRA Patron Member
Microgunner is offline  
Reply

Tags
caliber , fnh , rifle , scar , scar 16

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13580 seconds with 8 queries